faire_jour
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,188
- Reaction score
- 3
I do the research as well, and my feeling toward the technology itself is similar to sr171soars. It just that people don't agree with the mainstream understanding of the technology itself.
The thing is that society is fuelled by emotions, and rightfully so. You have to consider that many of the people involved in the debate were considered as "oral successes" and end up crashing and burning somewhere between high school and post-secondary. They are speaking up so children of this generation and the next generation don't have to go through the same thing.
Everyone does awesome for the first ten or twelves years, and that all researches focus on. It's the barrier that emerges after those first few years become problematic. So some of them are not really "talking out of their ass," unless you happen to be one of those stem-cell debaters. * rolls eyes *
Nothing is wrong with CIs, but it is the definition of insanity: keep doing the same thing over and over, but expecting a different result.
Honestly, fair_joure, everyone can see you have good intentions, but part of the reason why people are so adamant against your posts is because of the way they are worded.
Who did you think I was talking about
Oh, and people who have nothing to add to the discussion except to call names.