Family files $150M lawsuit against school that banned dog

Nesmuth

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
3,191
Reaction score
1
Family files $150M lawsuit against school that banned dog

Newsday (New York)

Long Island

Family files $150M lawsuit against school that banned dog

CARL MACGOWAN

Newsday Staff Writer



February 8, 2007, 8:29 PM EST

The East Meadow School District Thursday was slapped with a $150 million federal discrimination lawsuit by the family of a deaf Westbury boy whose assistance

dog has been barred from school.



John Cave Jr. and his parents, John and Nancy Cave, filed suit in Central Islip federal court after weeks of failing to convince school officials to let

the 14-year-old boy bring his dog to class. The district has refused, saying John has access to school resources without the dog, which they believe would

pose a health and safety hazard to other students and staff.



As part of the suit, the Caves asked Justice Arthur D. Spatt to issue an injunction ordering the district to let John bring his dog, Simba, to W. Tresper

Clarke High School. A decision is expected Monday, when the parties are due in court.



"During the entire month of January 2007, John Cave Jr. has been repeatedly, wrongfully and illegally denied access to a public school," the suit says.



Superintendent Robert Dillon said Thursday he had not seen the lawsuit and could not comment.



The suit demands $50 million in damages and $100 million in punitive damages. Earlier this week, the Caves filed a notice of claim against the district

in State Supreme Court in Nassau County, alleging violations of state civil rights and human rights law.



Dillon said in a statement Thursday that some charges contained in the notice of claim were "completely false."



"The district and its administration have always treated this student and his family with respect and have provided and will continue to provide the student

with the educational services he needs," Dillon said.



The federal suit accuses district officials of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act by barring Simba. On several occasions, John was allowed to

attend classes after Simba was taken home by John's parents.



The notice of claim and the federal suit name as defendants the school district and more than a dozen district officials, including Dillon and school board

members.



The federal suit says Simba's effectiveness as a service dog is impaired if he spends too much time away from John, who can hear only with cochlear implants.

Simba, a 2-year-old yellow Labrador retriever, became John's service dog in December after six months of training.



"Simba is alone six to eight hours a day and has been declining in his ability and training, and as such is in serious risk of failing to provide the services

he was trained to provide," the lawsuit says.



Dillon said service dogs are banned from school "to foster a safe and effective school environment."
 
Uhh.... this seems like a slam dunk case. Doesn't the ADA provide provisions for service dogs??
 
This is bullshit. $150 million for this? Why $150 million!?

What about the students who are allergic to dogs? They have rights!
 
Don't agree with the $150 mil. but Service Dogs should not be barred from doing their job.

If the dog looses it's skills through dis-use it no longer is a service dog. That is not cool. :(
 
I think 150 millions is a bit over the top but I also think service dogs should be allowed in school.
 
The case is a winner and it will set precedence. Thats why we need the enforcement of Title II. And an $150 million case is an appropriate action to enforce the Title II of the ADA.

It's unbelievable that the school still defends themselves with textbook excuses.

Richard
 
The case is a winner and it will set precedence. Thats why we need the enforcement of Title II. And an $150 million case is an appropriate action to enforce the Title II of the ADA.

It's unbelievable that the school still defends themselves with textbook excuses.

Richard

Agreed, but I thought the ADA only allowed for injunctive relief and direct damages, not punitive damages - $150 million is certainly greater than the cost of training a hearing dog.

Or is Title II different in terms of the damages it allows?
 
Ok... I still don't understand why he needs a dog at school? It seems stupid.

It was posted in another thread..something about the bonding time needed cuz it was a new dog for the boy.

I really dont know much about hearing dogs so I really dont have an opinion about this but it does to me seem kinda excessive what the parents are doing. Then again, I am not there so I dont know the full story. :dunno:
 
Ok... I still don't understand why he needs a dog at school? It seems stupid.

Ditto. He has an interpreter. If his parents want him to bond with the dog that badly, they can home-school him. This whole thing seems pretty silly to me.
 
absurd -- Money money money money! That Deaf kid can use his eyes to watch out.
 
Sounds like she wants money MORE than caring what's right for her kid, she's insane. How many threads are there of this :S It's been reposted like 3 times already. Completely ridiculous.
 
The case is a winner and it will set precedence. Thats why we need the enforcement of Title II. And an $150 million case is an appropriate action to enforce the Title II of the ADA.

It's unbelievable that the school still defends themselves with textbook excuses.

Richard
that does make sense..
 
Ahhh... they look for an excuse to find a way to get MONEY MONEY MONEY!!! Look for a treasure... look for a jackpot therefore they use a boy to bring a dog to school and take advantage of MONEY from a lawsuit against school ,,,,,,, ha ha ha ha
 
Beautiful!!!

This is the best news I've heard all day! After all the problems I've had with my hearing dog, as well as hearing about the problems LMM has been having, I'm contemplating law school after getting my college degree.
 
honest folks can't go about their lives without some people who's disabled trying to sue them or even non-disabled people. They're just following the rules. ADA and school rules are two different things. Do mind, I'm deaf and wouldn't ever sue a school over 150m just cause they didn't let me bring a mutt to school. It's common sense. I don't know about any of you, but I'm deaf and absoultely HATE special treatment. I can stand on my own damn two feet, get around fine with lip reading. He has a CI and do mind, back in grade school when we had fire drills I could literall FEEL the alarm, it's loud and reverbrates off the cold floor and various other places may be different with other people but c'mon... this is completely ridiculous. The point is, if I could feel the alarm without a HA or CI, chances are the kid can too, if not, he'd sure as hell hear a loud annoying noise blast in his head while he's on the can.
 
honest folks can't go about their lives without some people who's disabled trying to sue them or even non-disabled people. They're just following the rules. ADA and school rules are two different things. Do mind, I'm deaf and wouldn't ever sue a school over 150m just cause they didn't let me bring a mutt to school. It's common sense. I don't know about any of you, but I'm deaf and absoultely HATE special treatment. I can stand on my own damn two feet, get around fine with lip reading. He has a CI and do mind, back in grade school when we had fire drills I could literall FEEL the alarm, it's loud and reverbrates off the cold floor and various other places may be different with other people but c'mon... this is completely ridiculous. The point is, if I could feel the alarm without a HA or CI, chances are the kid can too, if not, he'd sure as hell hear a loud annoying noise blast in his head while he's on the can.

Florida state law allows all publics (like store, mall, groceries, & other public places), schools (private & public), colleges, universities to allow guide, hearing, & service dogs only and you have valid service, guide dog trained certificate.

I was in Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (as FSDB) Student 1984-1992 . I have seen one deaf & blind employee have certified guide see & hearing dog and few blind student does have guide dog in school.

also I had one deaf ex-girlfriend lives in Ormond Beach & currently live New Port Richey, FL She had a retired hearing dog name is Gator that Gator is black poodle dog right now his eye was got blind. Gator is living with ex-girlfriend's older sister in Plant City, FL.
 
Last edited:
Ok... I still don't understand why he needs a dog at school? It seems stupid.

no it's not about if it's stupid or not. It's about RIGHTS. The law entitles us to have whatever the accommodation we can have in public places. It does not matter if it's necessary to bring a dog to school or not. The law's law. The rights' rights. What school did is a clear violation of federal and state law. $150m is excessive though.
 
Back
Top