nyyankees154
New Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 0
There is already a strict harassment policy already. If a soldier goes through the right channels and there is any kind of harassment(sexual or not) the person or group gets UCMJ actions on them(court marshaled, extra duty, loss of pay, jail time, kicked out of the military, etc...). As long and the soldier is abiding to the DADT policy, they are covered. DADT policy goes both ways too. I can not go up and ask another soldier if they are gay, lesbian or bi. If I do, then they could get me in trouble for that too.There is problem about GLBT population is much minority and they don't treat same equal rights as straight people do, especially in military. :roll:
Look at UK, Canada and some NATO countries allow openly gay soldiers to serve in military.
Worry about gay soldiers to being harassed or put down? What about update the harassment policy to protect gay soldiers from being harassed or put down but I know it won't completely rid of harassment issues because some people choose to be homophobia.
I see DADT as unfair and discrimination, even my father, retired from Marines agreed with me.
I believe that gay soldiers should have choice to openly about their sex orientation and I don't know if increase of harassment or threat may happen but for me, if I want serve in military so I rather to keep sex orientation closeted (privately), just like I do in real life after situation with homophobia students in 5 years ago.
Now, there some soldiers that cross the line, and it could be the fact they either think their soo called friends would understand, or their battle buddies trying to have some fun and things get out of hand.(which probably happens when the gay-bashing happens). There a lot of young people that their first true time away from family is in the military. Most either never had gay friends or just never been aware of it till they left their homes. They also have the high school mind set still and still do their clicks in the military. That is where the DADT policy suppose to protect the soldier, not put them down.