Do you think it's good idea to label

Should the clone meat to be label?

  • Yes, they should (opinion)

    Votes: 7 33.3%

  • Yes, the label on clone meat is an obligation - no opinion but fact

    Votes: 9 42.9%

  • No, they don't have to

    Votes: 2 9.5%

  • Why should they label clone meat for?

    Votes: 1 4.8%

  • I don't care - meat is meat, period

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • Total voters
    21
Bear said:
Liebling,

Im sorry I will take this in pm with you not here in the open forum. I did not realize you were even upset with me. I try to read all the posts daily, but sometimes life does get in the way.
Click to expand...

Okay, no problem.

You will get my reply via PM later.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
Excuse me please...

It´s PowerON who label the people as "dummy" who misread the label, etc which is a provoke and not nice word. I quoted his post telling him to not say "dummy" please because it´s not nice word. Is my post hard to understand or what? I wasn´t realized that I was being humliated and blamed for that which is an unacceptance. Is those word, I made an offensive, insult and bash?
Click to expand...

If PowerOn's post been remove, and another member quoted his post, it also has to be remove to avoid any further necessary confusion. I don't see the problem with it, I really don't. :ugh3:


Anyways for this point of this thread, I have no comment. :)
 
Cheri said:
If PowerOn's post been remove, and another member quoted his post, it also has to be remove to avoid any further necessary confusion. I don't see the problem with it, I really don't. :ugh3:


Anyways for this point of this thread, I have no comment. :)
Click to expand...

I can see that you don't get what I tried to explain. My repeat and last explanation was #40.

Unfortunlately I can see that my last of my repeat explanation # 40 is being ignored and denied.

End of Discussion!!!!!
 
Liebling:-))) said:
I can see that you don't get what I tried to explain. My repeat and last explanation was #40.

End of Discussion!!!!!
Click to expand...

Repeat? You did not explained yourself clear on the first time, now that I've read post number 40, that's much a better explanation. :ty:
 
Cheri said:
Repeat? You did not explained yourself clear on the first time, now that I've read post number 40, that's much a better explanation. :ty:
Click to expand...



You came to tell me at your post #44 to understand my explanation post #40 better which my post #40 was long here before you made your post #42... It look like that you don't bother to read the whole since my first post #15 but jump on my post. ?

Unfortunlately yes, I REPEATED since my post #15 over those moderator's word is not very hard. RE-READ carefully. It's not edit post but moderator's word.

One person who understood and got my point in first place.
 
Liebling:-))) said:


You came to tell me at your post #42 to understand my explanation post #40 better which my post #40 was long here... It look like that you don't read the whole since my last post #40 ?

Unfortunlately yes, I REPEATED since my post #15 over those moderator's word is not very hard. RE-READ carefully. It's not edit post but moderator's word.

One person who understood and got my point in first place.
Click to expand...

*smh* Look at yourself, You keep going on and on and on. (no more further comment coming from me) I'm disappointing in you, Liebling. :(
 
Cheri said:
*smh* Look at yourself, You keep going on and on and on. (no more further comment coming from me) I'm disappointing in you, Liebling. :(
Click to expand...

You must have read my post toward Bear to solve with her via PM but you choose to jump to tell me off here after my last post toward Bear and also without read my last explanation #40. I asked you to end of discussion please because you choose to not bother to read my post #40 in first place.

Yes, I am very disappointing in you for not want to try to understand where I come from but ignore and denied my repeat posts since #15.

You do read my last post toward Bear, don't you? Bear came to tell me to solve with her via PM. It's between me and her.

Enough for now.
 
Liebling, not everyone reads the whole thread before replying, and second, not everyone can understand what we all are saying until one explains it a bit more clearly...


:holding up a peace sign:
 
Mod Note

Recently, taking care of what needs to be taken care of, therefore, let's get back to for which this thread is concerned with-- :ty:


(to all those who tried to make suggestions, advice, etc., thank you)





~RR
 
Back
Top