Detroit plummets 25% in 2010 Census

sequoias

Active Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
22,242
Reaction score
19
Motor City population declines 25% - USATODAY.com

DETROIT — Detroit's population plunged 25% in the past decade to 713,777, the lowest count since 1910, four years before Henry Ford offered $5 a day to autoworkers, sparking a boom that quadrupled the Motor City's size in the first half of the 20th century.

Source: Census Bureau
"You can talk about undercounts, but it's going to be very difficult to prove and they are going to have to go to the courts," said demographer Kurt Metzger, director of Data Drive Detroit, a non-profit data research firm.
Census counts are crucial because the numbers are used to distribute more than $400 billion in federal funds to local and state governments each year and to make decisions about what community services to provide.
Fueled by the implosion of the domestic auto industry, the Motor City's 237,493-resident decline helped make Michigan the only state to experience a net population loss since 2000.
Overall, the state's population fell by about 54,000, a 0.6% decline at a time when the nation's population grew about 9.7%. Michigan's population in the decade peaked in 2006 and has been declining since, according to Census figures.
Metzger said he was shocked by Detroit's total — down from 951,270 in 2000 — saying he expected it to come in the 778,000 range.
He said a bad economy drove many people out, but so did falling home prices in the suburbs, which are now within reach of many lower-income Detroiters.
Other issues such as schools, safety and insurance and tax rates, which are higher in Detroit than in the suburbs, also fueled the move.
"They have chosen to vote with their feet," Metzger said.
Detroit experienced a bigger population drop in the 1970s when it lost 310,695 residents, but that was a smaller percentage loss, about 20%.
The Detroit City Council pledged to challenge the figures, saying tens of thousands of residents were likely missed in the count.
"There was a lack of participation" from residents, Councilman James Tate said. "We see apathy setting in with a lot of folks."
Detroit, once the USA's fourth-most-populous city, dropped from 10th in 2000 to 18th, below Midwestern neighbors such as Columbus, Ohio, and Indianapolis and southern cities such as Austin, Charlotte, Fort Worth and Jacksonville, Fla.
One Michigan resident to move out was John Bessette, 44, who grew up in suburban Detroit and moved to an exurb of Pittsburgh in August 2010 after commuting there for almost two years.
His company, Aim Construction, builds medical facilities and wanted to be located where that field was growing.
"With the economy, even before the bad times, everybody was tightening up their purse strings" in Detroit, he said.
"It was really a good time to go look at somewhere else."
Bessette and his family make the four-hour drive to Michigan about once a month to visit, he said.
Detroit isn't the only city in the region to lose residents. Chicago, Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Cincinnati also logged their smallest headcounts in at least 100 years. Milwaukee and Toledo are at their lowest levels since 1940.
But on a percentage basis, Detroit's loss was most acute in the region. Detroit lost 25%, Cleveland lost 17%, and Cincinnati lost 10%, according to Census figures.
Detroit's percentage loss rivals the 29% drop in New Orleans, which was devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Detroit's numerical loss was larger than New Orleans, which lost 139,834.
Other parts of Michigan fared better.
The seven counties surrounding Grand Rapids in western Michigan grew by 6.2%, and the northwest part of the state's Lower Peninsula around Traverse City grew 5.8%.
The state changed racially, too. The white population fell 2%, and the black population fell almost 1%. The Hispanic population rose 35%, though Hispanics constitute just 4.4% of the state overall. The state's Asian population rose 35%, making Asians 2.4% of Michigan residents.
 
In my opinion, I think it's because some of the Census workers were afraid of knocking on doors in Detroit crime ridden areas which they didn't count everyone in Detroit. I think they didn't want to get killed and rather undercount the population. Anyone think so?
 
Well, it's hardly a surprise knowing what the city is like.
 
I don't know. The population in our area is growing, too fast. Many people from Michigan and Ohio move to South Carolina.
 
Our state population increased 15.3% since the last census.

My county's population increased 41.6% since the last census.

My town's population increased 56% since the last census.
 
The Census has a history of undercounting population so that might be the case on why Detroit was not counted properly.

In my county grew 2.4% but the fastest growing county in Iowa is Dallas County with 56% increase from the last Census.

One town called Snoqualmie in Washington state saw an impressive growth from only 1,631 to a little over 10,000 with 534% increase from the last census. King County grew 11.2% from 1,737,034 to 1,931,249 where Snoqualmie and Seattle is.
 
My state has expanded exponentially. We've had over 600,000 people move in 5 years. So, if the trend continues, then Melbourne will be the largest city in Australia.

Believe me, I don't want my state to become too big let alone my country.
 
According to Census Bureau regulations, if it looks dangerous and you don't feel safe approaching that residence, then don't. Tag it and move on. I know as I worked the 2010 Census as an Enumerator out of the Little Rock office but my work was carried out here locally.

I'm not surprised about the massive drop though because a lot of the automobile factories cut jobs or shut doors in the wake of the economic recession/depression. If you don't work with the auto company directly, many many many jobs in Detroit depended on the auto industry, especially blue collar jobs. If there are no jobs, why stay? Many left Detroit to seek opportunity elsewhere. I have noticed many people are moving here from up North from places such as Minnesota, Chicago, Iowa, New York, Washington State, and others because they hear there is opportunity in the poultry industry. Some move here and open contract chicken houses, some go to work directly for the poultry company. However many don't realize it is hard work and they don't stay for long. Usually 6 to 9 months and they are gone.
 
According to Census Bureau regulations, if it looks dangerous and you don't feel safe approaching that residence, then don't. Tag it and move on. I know as I worked the 2010 Census as an Enumerator out of the Little Rock office but my work was carried out here locally.

I'm not surprised about the massive drop though because a lot of the automobile factories cut jobs or shut doors in the wake of the economic recession/depression. If you don't work with the auto company directly, many many many jobs in Detroit depended on the auto industry, especially blue collar jobs. If there are no jobs, why stay? Many left Detroit to seek opportunity elsewhere. I have noticed many people are moving here from up North from places such as Minnesota, Chicago, Iowa, New York, Washington State, and others because they hear there is opportunity in the poultry industry. Some move here and open contract chicken houses, some go to work directly for the poultry company. However many don't realize it is hard work and they don't stay for long. Usually 6 to 9 months and they are gone.

Well, all of automobile factories are in suburb of Detroit, not in city limit anymore since 40-50 years ago and suburb of Detroit is still growing, not a lot.
 
I know there is not much work in MI, Most of the family I had out there has been forced to relocate for work
 
Back
Top