Deforestation: Problems

FireTiger said:
Are you depopulating the humans, animals, and the plants that produce CO^2 at night or in adverse conditions?
Click to expand...

no no. Plants need CO2. Humans do not breathe out enough CO2 for plants to breathe in.
 
Jiro said:
no no. Plants need CO2. Humans do not breathe out enough CO2 for plants to breathe in.
Click to expand...

There's more then humans that make CO^2... all the animals, the livestock, the fisheries... anything decomposing... and some plants...
 
Jiro said:
no no. Plants need CO2. Humans do not breathe out enough CO2 for plants to breathe in.
Click to expand...

Actually, the less plants we have, the worse the air quality becomes. If we produce more CO2, it will be too difficult for the plants to keep up with it.
 
Banjo said:
Actually, the less plants we have, the worse the air quality becomes. If we produce more CO2, it will be too difficult for the plants to keep up with it.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It has to be a fine balance.
 
Banjo said:
Actually, the less plants we have, the worse the air quality becomes. If we produce more CO2, it will be too difficult for the plants to keep up with it.
Click to expand...

That's what regulator is for.
 
jillio said:
Exactly. It has to be a fine balance.
Click to expand...

There isn't currently fine balance anyway and our plants aren't dying from excessive CO2. They're dying from deforestation.
 
FireTiger said:
There's more then humans that make CO^2... all the animals, the livestock, the fisheries... anything decomposing... and some plants...
Click to expand...

Good luck dealing with those foul-smelling things and their excretions. And not to mention the fact that these animals require massive amount of consumption.
 
Jiro said:
There isn't currently fine balance anyway and our plants aren't dying from excessive CO2. They're dying from deforestation.
Click to expand...

Man screwed it up, man tries to fix it, man makes bigger mess.:roll:
 
Jiro said:
Good luck dealing with those foul-smelling things and their excretions. And not to mention the fact that these animals require massive amount of consumption.
Click to expand...

So, we need to get rid of anything that decomposes and all the animals and fish?

There's a plan!:bowlol:
 
jillio said:
So, we need to get rid of anything that decomposes and all the animals and fish?

There's a plan!:bowlol:
Click to expand...
We don't need them

FireTiger said:
Well much of these animals... eat...

...wait for it...

plants...
Click to expand...
If you scroll back to the part where we had to manufacture O2 and CO2, that would means we'll be inside biosphere. Makes sense, right?
 
Jiro said:
We don't need them


If you scroll back to the part where we had to manufacture O2 and CO2, that would means we'll be inside biosphere. Makes sense, right?
Click to expand...

We don't need them?:shock:

Well, I can see this discussion is over. Someone is out of touch with reality today.
 
FireTiger said:
Well won't be making O^2 - but maybe CO^2 but why?
Click to expand...

Well, you're probably right, perhaps there would be more than enough CO^2 for plant life, but it's a byproduct of our respiratory system and I we don't output as much of it as we take in oxygen(19 cubic feet).
 
VacationGuy234 said:
Well, you're probably right, perhaps there would be more than enough CO^2 for plant life, but it's a byproduct of our respiratory system and I we don't output as much of it as we take in oxygen(19 cubic feet).
Click to expand...

In balance we do. Stop the deforestation.
 
jillio said:
We don't need them?:shock:

Well, I can see this discussion is over. Someone is out of touch with reality today.
Click to expand...

have you ever seen a biosphere that includes livestocks?
 
Back
Top