Declaration of Occupy Wall Street

Status
Not open for further replies.
There was no media coverage over this. Come to think of it, there was no media coverage of the points the protesters were trying to make. Ironical.

And there's no media coverage of senate bill 1867 either. This is seriously messed up and the American citizens really need to start exercising their rights to have the laws and the Constitution upheld.

Right now, OWS is consistently being labeled terrorists by the Right, imagine if Republicans were in power and they decide to invoke Bill 1867 to deal with those protesting against the government. I shudder to think about it.
 
And there's no media coverage of senate bill 1867 either. This is seriously messed up and the American citizens really need to start exercising their rights to have the laws and the Constitution upheld.

Right now, OWS is consistently being labeled terrorists by the Right, imagine if Republicans were in power and they decide to invoke Bill 1867 to deal with those protesting against the government. I shudder to think about it.

Me, too. I am so scared the military will be used for crowd control.
 
Your nitpickiness is getting to be abnormal. Just saying.

Not at all. This was in Bloomberg Markets, on the ABC site. It's not exactly "Breaking News" the fight had been going on for a long time.
 
Last edited:
Not at all. This was in Blooberg Markets, on the ABC site. It's not exactly "Breaking News" the fight has been going on for a long time.

for a long time? so you were made aware of this prior to Dec. 1st (the date when deafcaroline created a thread)

and how is it "a long time" if Senate Bill 1867 was introduced on November 15th? :dunno2:
 
And there's no media coverage of senate bill 1867 either. This is seriously messed up and the American citizens really need to start exercising their rights to have the laws and the Constitution upheld.

Right now, OWS is consistently being labeled terrorists by the Right, imagine if Republicans were in power and they decide to invoke Bill 1867 to deal with those protesting against the government. I shudder to think about it.

:shock: So do I.
 
Right now, OWS is consistently being labeled terrorists by the Right, imagine if Republicans were in power and they decide to invoke Bill 1867 to deal with those protesting against the government. I shudder to think about it.

I think a group like OWS is pretty safe. :lol:

It's pretty funny, people complain about each side of congress "blocking" then when they work together, compromise and vote overwhelmingly for something people complain about that too. 93 votes, a large chunk of them lawyers, I think "the people" are safe.
 
I did click on it and no CC showed up. don't you think a woman who has been stone deaf for 40 years and been using youtube for several years and has a youtube account would know by now about the CC button?

I don't use audio transcribe because it's useless. I am not getting the joke of people saying things I don't understand and video footage of a jeep in a parking lot. that went over my head.

That's why I am asking if you mind transcribing. If you don't want to, ok.

I hate transcribed audio because it keep getting words all mixed up and the speech recognition leaves a lot to be desired hence the horrible results. :P I especially hate this on how to do videos.
 
I think a group like OWS is pretty safe. :lol:

It's pretty funny, people complain about each side of congress "blocking" then when they work together, compromise and vote overwhelmingly for something people complain about that too. 93 votes, a large chunk of them lawyers, I think "the people" are safe.

Do you think all americans are safe under the senate bill 1867? You don't think it's a violation of the constitution? congress voted on this and it wasn't in the media until the vote was already done. I had searched for a week for any mention of 1867 in any major newspaper. Zilch. Nada. that raises a red flag.

I don't know...I just hope that bill won't get abused.
 
Do you think all americans are safe under the senate bill 1867? You don't think it's a violation of the constitution? congress voted on this and it wasn't in the media until the vote was already done. I had searched for a week for any mention of 1867 in any major newspaper. Zilch. Nada. that raises a red flag.

I don't know...I just hope that bill won't get abused.

It will be. That is why it was made.
 
Do you think all americans are safe under the senate bill 1867? You don't think it's a violation of the constitution? congress voted on this and it wasn't in the media until the vote was already done. I had searched for a week for any mention of 1867 in any major newspaper. Zilch. Nada. that raises a red flag.

I don't know...I just hope that bill won't get abused.

Yeah I think all Americans are safe under this bill except for the one's that engage in terrorist activities. I haven't seen anything I would unconstitutional in the bill. I am sure the SC will rule eventually if this ever becomes law.

It took me less than a minute to find this

Defense bill gives military too much responsibility for detainees - The Washington Post

Another to find this

http://loyalopposition.blogs.nytime...ent-obama-veto-the-defense-authorization-act/
 
Yeah I think all Americans are safe under this bill except for the one's that engage in terrorist activities. I haven't seen anything I would unconstitutional in the bill. I am sure the SC will rule eventually if this ever becomes law.

It took me less than a minute to find this

Defense bill gives military too much responsibility for detainees - The Washington Post

I just grabbed the first site I found through google. Just to make a point: C.I.A. no al-qaeda ever existed - BBC documentary "the power of nightmares" | Polidics.com
 
for a long time? so you were made aware of this prior to Dec. 1st (the date when deafcaroline created a thread)

and how is it "a long time" if Senate Bill 1867 was introduced on November 15th? :dunno2:

You are confused. We are talking about 2 different topics.
 
Blame google for that....or the blogs. It's the sad state of the internet, legitimate sources get buried all the time.

Yeah. Well, I bet I could find "legitimate" sources, but why bother? I know it to be true.
 
Yeah. Well, I bet I could find "legitimate" sources, but why bother? I know it to be true.

Legitimate sources are available. Some just choose to ignore them in favor of the fringe sites.
 
Blame google for that....or the blogs. It's the sad state of the internet, legitimate sources get buried all the time.

Blogs can hardly be considered a legitimate source. It is one person's opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top