Death threats to Palin and her family

Status
Not open for further replies.
jillio said:
Riiiight.:cool2:
Click to expand...

Jamaat ul-Fuqra - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to a profile of al-Fuqra by the National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT), the group is believed to have been founded by Pakistani cleric Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani Hashemi in 1980. Gilani, who lives in Pakistan and was questioned there in connection with the abduction of Daniel Pearl,[10] founded the group on a trip to the United States. Members initially engaged mostly in attacks against Indians and Indian religious figures in the US.[11]
Click to expand...

Why don't you go ahead and research Islamberg, NY
 
So far the people who said "aye" that it's wrong to issue threats or commit to the damage or destruction of properties relating to U.S. politicians. This includes any form of physical attacks which is implied here.

Reba
Tousi
Kokonut
PFH
Txgolfer
Banjo
Dgirl101
Saywhatkid
Karissamann05
Mrs Bucket

Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far. Did I miss anyone?
 
Reba said:
Accepting risk still doesn't give a free pass to those who would threaten or make physical attacks, or use intimidation or vandalism against politicians, celebrities, or people of notoriety. At least that's the way it is in America.
Click to expand...

Well spoken, Reba. Why those keep silent about violence against U.S. policians when it's wrong to do so? I simply cannot understand the keeping mum on this one.
 
souggy said:
I thought Mrs. Buckets said "do not" while sight-reading because she usually ask others not speak for her in the past.
Click to expand...

jillio said:
Whew! Glad I am not the only one that misread it.:lol:
Click to expand...

Beowulf said:
Me too, even though she said it very loud and clear and stood and shouted in my ear. :lol:
Click to expand...


:giggle: I just love you and your humour Beowulf!! I'm a wee bit knackered here and it's because I have quite a bit of sunburn. Let's call it windburn as hubby, I and Lil'Bit were walking over 6 hours in Toronto. Yes, I'm drifting off to sleep here and there typing this post. :zzz:
 
ayes for me as well. Don't believe in name calling either. Nor insulting them for their political beliefs -- very immature.
 
So far the people who said "aye" that it's wrong to issue threats or commit to the damage or destruction of properties relating to U.S. politicians. This includes any form of physical attacks which is implied here.

Reba
Tousi
Kokonut
PFH
Txgolfer
Banjo
Dgirl101
Saywhatkid
Karissamann05
Mrs Bucket
Lighthouse77

Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far and those who aren't. Hmmmm....

Did I miss anyone?
 
kokonut said:
So far the people who said "aye" that it's wrong to issue threats or commit to the damage or destruction of properties relating to U.S. politicians. This includes any form of physical attacks which is implied here.

Reba
Tousi
Kokonut
PFH
Txgolfer
Banjo
Dgirl101
Saywhatkid
Karissamann05
Mrs Bucket
Lighthouse77

Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far and those who aren't. Hmmmm....

Did I miss anyone?
Click to expand...


are you making a "watch" list? :giggle:

of course its wrong to threaten "anyone" .... even law abiding militia group members.

even law abiding tax payers. Why should public elected officials be granted "special status" over the rest of the law abiding citizens of the US? They are representatives, not dictators.
 
So far the people who said "aye" that it's wrong to issue threats or commit to the damage or destruction of properties relating to U.S. politicians. This includes any form of physical attacks which is implied here.

Reba
Tousi
Kokonut
PFH
Txgolfer
Banjo
Dgirl101
Saywhatkid
Karissamann05
Mrs Bucket
Lighthouse77
Steinhauer

Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far and those who aren't. Hmmmm....

Did I miss anyone?
 
kokonut said:
So far the people who said "aye" that it's wrong to issue threats or commit to the damage or destruction of properties relating to U.S. politicians. This includes any form of physical attacks which is implied here.

Reba
Tousi
Kokonut
PFH
Txgolfer
Banjo
Dgirl101
Saywhatkid
Karissamann05
Mrs Bucket
Lighthouse77
Steinhauer

Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far and those who aren't. Hmmmm....

Did I miss anyone?
Click to expand...

Why only policticians? It is wrong across the board.:cool2:
 
kokonut said:
Who else agrees? Interesting to see who is on the list so far and those who aren't. Hmmmm....

Did I miss anyone?
Click to expand...

post reported.

3.) NO TROLLING. A troll is someone who provokes members into flaming discussions by posting outrageous messages, and usually ends with name callings and flame wars.
Click to expand...

8.) Members may not scroll unnecessarily. Scrolling can refer to the following:

a.) Excessive quoting
b.) Excessive smilies, pictures
c.) Marquee images, text (scrolling horizontally)
d.) Anything that is repetitious
Click to expand...

9.) No bashing, flaming or harassing other members. Period.
Click to expand...

10.) No enticing or provoking other members to cause them to get into trouble.
Click to expand...
 
TXgolfer said:
I thought Steinhauer "aye" was obvious

It appears you don't have an eye for an "aye"

:lol:
Click to expand...
I think he just wants to confirm so there are no misunderstandings. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top