- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 4,335
- Reaction score
- 5
How many of those would become teachers, but are discouraged from doing so because of their speech skills, and the limited number of bi-bi programs available?
Teaching used to be a primary occupation of deaf adults, in the days when Deaf schools used ASL as the language of instruction. Not just as teachers, but as employees of all sorts at the institutions. The number of deaf individuals even studying education has plummeted in correlation to the push for more oral programs. That is the point being made. The push in deaf education today is restricting deaf individuals' employment opportunities. Ironic, isn't it?
My point is that some people are using the simple comment "1 or 2 deaf teachers in oral schools" as PROOF that deaf teachers are being discouraged from teaching there. I'm saying that it's a horrendous argument simply because there aren't that many deaf teachers in the first place. Now if people have seen it first hand or something, well, that's a different matter. I wouldn't be surprised if oral schools tend to shy away from deaf teachers for a number of reasons.