Deaf school criticized as numbers slide

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
6
Argus Leader Media - News

Two candidates for superintendent visiting the School for the Deaf last week found a campus with shrinking enrollment and tales of both happiness and frustration from families whose children don't hear well.

A Sioux Falls institution dating to 1880, the school had more than 130 students in the 1970s, along with an energetic dormitory life and the promise of a cultural haven for children to succeed in their deafness.

The school will have only 38 children in grades K-12 this fall - with eight in high school and a curriculum forcing students to take courses elsewhere in order to graduate. Most receiving help today are not enrolled at the school, but are off-campus as specialists provide outreach services to 221 children around the state.

"The school started out as an orphanage. Over time, things change," said Judy Bakkene, a program specialist on the staff since 1986.

But alongside changes in education and medical gains that let children hear for the first time are accounts of families feeling helpless about what they see as the school failing its mission.

Jorden Curran, who's been taught at the school since age 2, is 14 today and about to enter ninth grade. He is deaf, autistic and losing his eyesight. He is also about to learn that he must divide his high school days between Sioux Falls and Flandreau because the deaf school does not offer algebra.

"He loves the School for the Deaf," his mother, Deanne Curran, said from the family's home in Flandreau. "But if he stayed there, there's no way he'd be able to graduate to be prepared to go to college, because they won't provide entry-level math."

This confounds Rick Weber, the Flandreau superintendent, who now is making arrangements to teach Jorden a half-day and give him a 45-mile noon-hour ride to Sioux Falls.

"I have trouble understanding how an accredited school does not offer math to their high school students," Weber said. "My understanding is they won't have high school English next year," Weber added, voicing a concern that several parents also mentioned in recent interviews.

Algebra, physics, chemistry among subjects not offered

Joel Grim, principal at the School for the Deaf since 2004, said the concerns are only partly true. English class will continue. But the algebra teacher resigned, so that offering has been dropped. The school does offer consumer math, although that class doesn't satisfy any of the three curriculum pathways the state requires for a high school diploma.

"We are just unable to offer the algebra class at this time," Grim said. "We don't have an individual to teach that class. We're such a small school, we can't offer everything."

Maureen Schloss, departing this summer after three years as the deaf school's superintendent, said most high school students there are dual-enrolled, and all would need courses elsewhere to graduate.

This will be the first year without algebra, she said. The school hasn't offered physics or chemistry in at least three years, though it does offer biology and physical science. Schloss said the deaf school, with a budget less than $4 million, is facing issues many towns face across the state.

"We're just like Lemmon and Eagle Butte, which don't have enough people to warrant keeping teachers in all areas," she said. "We can't have one teacher for one class for two students when the population is dwindling. We're very similar to other districts in South Dakota."

Jorden Curran's sister, Abigail, 6, also is deaf, autistic and losing her vision. She attended kindergarten last year in Flandreau. Her parents applied in June for her to be accepted at the School for the Deaf this fall and await an answer. For now, she's due to repeat kindergarten in Flandreau.

Weber hired a deaf educator, a $29,500 position, to assist Abigail and expects a similar cost to help Jorden in the coming year. The Flandreau district also will pick up the expense to shuttle Jorden to Sioux Falls during lunch, about $20 a day or $3,500 a year.

Tad Perry, executive director of the South Dakota Board of Regents, said the School for the Deaf provides a service, but local districts remain responsible for a child's education.

"Realistically, we cannot offer every class desired by every child in a high school for eight students," Perry said. "The demographics suggest the high school will not get any larger."

Asked whether the school would close, Perry said: "I'm not going there. We still have a service to provide. In the foreseeable future, I don't see any change."

Isaac Nold, who turns 10 on Monday, attended the School for the Deaf during a 45-day evaluation in 2003, then was turned away. He has a brother, Caleb, 6, who hears perfectly and wrestles with him in the living room of the family's west Sioux Falls home. But Isaac is profoundly deaf, has cerebral palsy and a nerve disorder that keeps him from feeling pain in his face. He can swallow yogurt but otherwise is fed through a tube.
Rejected for admission because of other disability

Teresa Nold, Isaac's mother, said the school rejected Isaac because deafness is not his primary disability.

"I thought he did great," she said. "Other students enjoyed having him. Teachers enjoyed having him. We went in there thinking that he would actually be welcomed. We were told he wouldn't be able to learn or would not fit in. At the evaluation, they started off with, 'You can't come back. This isn't working out.' "

Isaac was dual-enrolled at the time, also attending Hayward Elementary. He's back now at Hayward full time.

"Hayward is great. We're getting the things that for the most part he needs," his mother said. "But the major thing he needs is a signing environment. I know he sees himself as different. I know he's frustrated. He has to rely on an adult to communicate for him, while peers around him are communicating with others, joking, laughing. I know he sees that."

She also applied for Isaac in 2000 and 2005 and was turned down. She has a file of correspondence pertaining to civil rights and fair education but doesn't know yet whether she'll pursue another application.

Nold said she finds it odd that a school for the deaf, a presumed advocate for deaf children, keeps her deaf child away. Her husband, Tim Nold, who is deaf, said that when he graduated from the school in 1984, many in his class of 18 had multiple disabilities. Teresa Nold, herself partly deaf, attended the school for a semester in high school before returning to Lincoln High. She said her son has a greater need for the school than she did.

Bakkene, the school's program specialist, said she couldn't discuss Isaac's situation or other individual cases. But one rule guiding admission is that "the primary handicap has to be hearing loss," she said. Success of children in their neighborhood schools such as Hayward is a sign that the system works, she said.

"If a school district is offering a good program for a youngster, that is essentially the least restrictive environment," Bakkene said. "That's the way it goes. The fact they're happy with the program there is key."

The school serves students whose personalized education plans require what the Sioux Falls campus offers.

"Most school districts don't have a bilingual education program ... and don't have the auditory-oral program for kids with a cochlear implant," said Schloss, who is returning to teach at Northern State University.
Some parents say school has not been responsive

Enrollment at the deaf school soared in the 1930s, '60s and '70s on the wing of rubella, meningitis and other diseases. Medicine improved, deafness became moderate more often, and science helped more children hear. Federal laws ushered in mandates for local schools helping children with disabilities.

"With special education, improvements in teaching and hearing aids ... the least restrictive environment keeping kids in their home school has been the way things have moved," Bakkene said.

The deaf school's dormitory, down to six students, closed in 2005. That space now is for after-school activities, outreach offices and parent-child education. The school offers free audiolingual testing in a diagnostic clinic for South Dakotans from birth to age 21.

Michelle Foy said her daughter, Catherine, 9, has been well-served at the school. Catherine attends St. Michael Elementary in the morning and goes to the School for the Deaf in the afternoon.

Catherine has a cochlear implant and is in the deaf school's auditory-oral curriculum, where the emphasis is on hearing and speaking, not sign language. She now talks on the phone, sings and plays a guitar.

Catherine might switch someday to the deaf school's bilingual curriculum, where the emphasis is on American Sign Language for conversation and English for reading and writing. "Signing will always be her first language," her mother said.

Catherine Foy has multiple health issues, including pulmonary and cardiovascular problems. She had 19 surgeries by age 2 and needs occupational and physical therapy. But hearing is her leading disability, which is her ticket to the school.

"I am pleased," Michelle Foy said of the school's performance, though she questioned why another mother, Teresa Nold, cannot enroll her child. "As a parent and taxpayer, I don't think I would disagree with her. That's too bad."

Other parents have questioned the school's direction, saying administrative decisions, not societal trends and medical gains, have caused enrollment to fall. School officials said layoffs at Communication Services for the Deaf, an agency on the same campus, have forced some families with deaf children to leave the state.

Julie Doucette, mother of a high school student, suspects a shift to eliminate ASL and offer only auditory-oral instruction. She suggests the school unfairly excludes some children and has an inadequate forum for parents to raise objections.

"To me, they're oppressing the already-oppressed," she said. "We need somebody who understands deaf culture," another parent, Jodie Engstler, said of the administration.

Perry said he is familiar with parents who have complained.

"I've talked to them. They just don't like the answers," he said.

The school now has 22 students in the bilingual program, including all eight in high school, and 16 in auditory-oral. Demand for auditory-oral is growing, as is demand for outreach that lets children stay in home districts, Perry said. Success of cochlear implants helps drive that, and that fact hits a nerve in deaf culture.

"This is a major shift in what the deaf community has experienced," Perry said. "The history is, if deaf, the only way to communicate has been sign language. But as technology takes over, you just shift that culture. That's a concern to people. I understand that and am sympathetic to that."
 
Many of my deaf friends and coworkers who are my age or older tell me the great stories of growing up in the Deaf schools and community in the 70s and 80s. What they had was very special cuz they had that bond even though not all know each other but still are bonded for life. I envy them cuz my hearing friends from my childhood dont hold that special meaning that many of the deaf people from that age group have shared.

They say that the younger deaf generation is very different...more at ill-ease with themselves and more uptight because more of them grew up mainstreamed. I can see that too cuz I was like that when I first started going to Gally...very uptight and didnt know how to joke around. The rapport I see between my deaf friends at deaf events with other deaf people is so awesome...even though they had never met but they are still connected in a lot of ways. I just think that generation had it the best and I am happy to be included with them and start my own memories with them. Thank god I found that!

Many of them asked me why do people want to mainstream deaf people and keep them out of deaf schools. They ask me who was complaining cuz they sure didnt so why change it? They said they were all happy with who they are growing up and wonder why is there a desperate need for deaf children to mingle with only hearing children, not other deaf children. They said they can interact with hearing people just fine and dont get it why hearing children are better models for deaf children than other deaf children or adults.

Gosh...I can see that at deaf events, when they meet people their age for the first time, they already know about each other's stories thru word of mouth that have been passed around for decades and immediately the bond starts there. Do u see that in the hearing community? My husband cant go up to his hearing co workers and say..hey, this is what happened to me in high school..did u hear about it. They would look at him like he is crazy while other deaf people in that age group would say "So that was U?? U did this or that? Yea, I heard about that..blah blah."

I asked them if they would change their upbringing and u know what they said...not for a million dollars and especially not for the opportunity to be raised orally or mainstreamed. On the other hand, I would change my upbringing to experience what they had.

BTW..many of them have advanced literacy skills so no issues with English there.
 
That's remain me about deaf school in GA, it was more than 300 students in early 90's but went declining to under 80 right now, also some years don't have graduation due no one are in senior, I just noticed from my friend.

Numerous of deaf school are losing students, some are gain more students in any years.
 
hey, hey! Do not insult mainstreamed/oral people here please. Thank you

She is not blaming the students enrolled in those programs....she is blaming the administrators or specialist who think they know so much about deaf education or deaf children when they dont have any background training in deaf education.

I am a product of the oral approach and I gotta say that it did me no good.
 
hey, hey! Do not insult mainstreamed/oral people here please. Thank you

What I meant was, the push toward mainstreaming for ALL students, and the revival of oralism has resulted in reduced enrollment in deaf schools. And with it, decreased literacy rates and higher drop out rates for mainstreamed deaf children. I did not intend to insult any deaf students who have been victimized by the process.
 
. But Isaac is profoundly deaf, has cerebral palsy and a nerve disorder that keeps him from feeling pain in his face. He can swallow yogurt but otherwise is fed through a tube.
Rejected for admission because of other disability

Teresa Nold, Isaac's mother, said the school rejected Isaac because deafness is not his primary disability.

"I thought he did great," she said. "Other students enjoyed having him. Teachers enjoyed having him. We went in there thinking that he would actually be welcomed. We were told he wouldn't be able to learn or would not fit in. At the evaluation, they started off with, 'You can't come back. This isn't working out.' "

That reminds me when I was discriminated by American School for the Deaf in '93.

I believe that Title V under IDEA should apply to ALL SCHOOLS...
 
That reminds me when I was discriminated by American School for the Deaf in '93.

I believe that Title V under IDEA should apply to ALL SCHOOLS...

If the schools dont have the funds to set up those specialized programs, how can they meet your needs? I dont think it was discrimination..just probably didnt have the funds to get the resources to meet Issac's needs.
 
That's remain me about deaf school in GA, it was more than 300 students in early 90's but went declining to under 80 right now, also some years don't have graduation due no one are in senior, I just noticed from my friend.

Numerous of deaf school are losing students, some are gain more students in any years.
Are you talking about GSD in Cedartown, right? If so, in the 1980s and 1990s, the state wanted to consolidate GSD with AASD in Atlanta (Clarkston) but they had backed off due to protests. Some parents/guardians and other people didn't want to see AASD turned into a residence school.

I don't think that deaf children should live at the residence schools. They should be home with their parents everyday.
 
Are you talking about GSD in Cedartown, right? If so, in the 1980s and 1990s, the state wanted to consolidate GSD with AASD in Atlanta (Clarkston) but they had backed off due to protests. Some parents/guardians and other people didn't want to see AASD turned into a residence school.

I don't think that deaf children should live at the residence schools. They should be home with their parents everyday.

Yup, it's located in Cave Spring.

If students live in cities that too far from deaf school then live in dorm would be quality.
 
Back
Top