Deaf murder accused pleads guilty to manslaughter

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
6
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/index.pl/article_news?id=154393647

A PARTIALLY deaf man accused of murder only pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter after he was informed by the judge hearing the case that he would not be further incarcerated for the crime.

Nigel "Spidey" Lucas, who celebrated his 36th birthday yesterday, has already spent more than seven years in jail, equivalent to 12 prison years, awaiting trial. He will be sentenced on Monday.

In an unusual hearing, defence attorney Keith Scotland submitted to Justice Joan Charles in the Port of Spain Second Criminal Court at the Hall of Justice that because of the client's deteriorating hearing impediment Lucas could not face a full trial for murder even if he was given the latest digital hearing aid.

A qualified audiologist, Mary Springer, had earlier testified that Lucas was not faking his ability not to hear properly and noted that exposure to a simple viral infection or loud music could cause the prisoner to become completely deaf.

Lucas, of Sherwood Park, Arima, admitted that he stabbed Troy Webb to death during a bar fight during Jouvert celebration on Carnival Monday (February 15), 1999 in the eastern borough.
 
Miss-Delectable said:
Nigel "Spidey" Lucas, who celebrated his 36th birthday yesterday, has already spent more than seven years in jail, equivalent to 12 prison years, awaiting trial. He will be sentenced on Monday.


What....is that like dog years or something? How is 7 years equivalent to 12 years?
 
Taylor said:
What....is that like dog years or something? How is 7 years equivalent to 12 years?

yes yes... def confuses me too... if anything i would think 5 years in jail is only compared to 1 year in prison... big boy jail (prison) is def worst than just jail....

gangsta put yo head on straight fo sho and explain dis. :cheers:
 
In an unusual hearing, defence attorney Keith Scotland submitted to Justice Joan Charles in the Port of Spain Second Criminal Court at the Hall of Justice that because of the client's deteriorating hearing impediment Lucas could not face a full trial for murder even if he was given the latest digital hearing aid.

A qualified audiologist, Mary Springer, had earlier testified that Lucas was not faking his ability not to hear properly and noted that exposure to a simple viral infection or loud music could cause the prisoner to become completely deaf.

How does that make sense? Isn't this what we have CART and the like for (I'm assuming he doesn't know ASL)? :roll:
 
Back
Top