Deaf girl dies after residency challenge

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
6
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3453385a10,00.html

"The parents of a deaf South African girl allegedly murdered by her father in Auckland were told by the Immigration Service the child and her deaf sister were a potential "burden on the state".

The Sunday Star-Times has learned that shortly before the girl's death, the parents received a letter from the Immigration Service indicating they might be denied New Zealand residency because the child and her deaf sister would be a drain on health services.

The parents, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had been in New Zealand for about two years. The girls were enrolled in school, and the family were applying for permanent residency.

When they arrived on two-year work permits, they were not required to undergo health screening and it is understood the parents did not realise their children's deafness could prevent them gaining residency.

The Immigration Service requires immigrants to prove they or their dependents will not be a burden on health services and applicants have to answer medical questions, including whether they have hearing difficulties.

Deaf children are considered a potential burden because of the need for surgery and cochlear implants.

One of the girls is understood to have needed an operation.

Human Rights Commissioner Rosslyn Noonan said the policy raised "serious questions about discrimination on the basis of disability".

She had asked the Immigration Service to provide evidence that immigrant families were coming to New Zealand to take advantage of better services, but none had been forthcoming.

The Immigration Service refused to talk about the case, but said all migrants applying for residency in New Zealand had to have an "acceptable standard of health".

"This means they must not be considered a danger to public health or be likely to require expensive New Zealand health services," spokeswoman Mary Anne Thompson said.

The service was unable to supply figures on how many people had been declined entry to New Zealand on health grounds.

It said the South African family had the right to apply for a medical waiver.

The Star-Times understands the letter to the South African couple approved the parents, but said their two daughters were potential burdens. The parents were asked to prove they would not be.

In August, a short time after the letter arrived, the father of the girls is alleged to have driven them off the side of Mt Wellington in Auckland.

The vehicle rolled more than 100m down the mountain and the oldest girl died.

The father was taken to hospital, where he was charged with murder and attempted murder.

The Star-Times understands the man was under stress from several factors, including the family's battle for permanent residency.

But an immigration source denied they were being unfairly treated. The man, a sales representative, has no family in New Zealand but his wife's parents live here. His wife is sticking by him.

Supporters said he had been dedicated to the children.

He has been visited in prison by former race relations conciliator Greg Fortuin, who is the honorary consul for South Africa.

Fortuin said he was called in by the man's family to ensure he was safe and he had access to legal help.

He could not comment on the immigration matter, "but it's definitely a tragic set of circumstances".

The principal of the school the girls were attending said they were legally enrolled almost two years ago. Their parents had to show they had a work permit. They also had approval from the Secretary for Education for the children to be enrolled in the school. "My view is that they are parents who cared deeply about their kids. They were valued members of the school community," the principal said.

He said about 25 per cent of his school's roll was made up of children born overseas.

The government last year announced stricter health screening requirements for immigrants, including medical examinations and an assessment of likely special education costs.

From November 28 this year there will be tougher restrictions on entering the country for people with health problems, including TB and HIV.

Deaf Association chief executive Jennifer Brain said: "I know the government was considering a law that would make it difficult for anyone who is deaf or disabled to immigrate to this country. I find this abhorrent."

Brain said she received a letter from the Immigration Service saying it would be implementing new migrant health screening requirements.

It included a copy of medical and chest x-ray certificates, and stated that all applicants, including children were required to undergo a medical examination and have a medical certificate submitted as part of the application process.

"The way it is worded I would say the government is looking to avoid bringing anyone into the country that may be considered a `cost' to the system and I find that very galling.

"As a deaf person, I am loathe to be considered a burden on the state. The law does seem draconian and selective."

Thompson said the Immigration Service considered every case.

"Included in this assessment are the costs of surgery, ongoing medication needs and the cost of health equipment and resources," she said.

"We do not make residency decisions lightly. We look at each applicant on a case by case basis and weigh up the different and often complex aspects involved."
 
I believe it will happen to our country - right here in this USA in the future. The Gov't couldn't afford all disabled/blind/deaf/crippled people to access their rights to meet their needs. Like for example : I learned that DVR/VR counselors have to wait for their funds from the Gov't before they could process to help disabled/deaf/blind/crippled people to get job/attend college for career/ or set up their own business.

I just visited one of DVR/VR offices and questioned them about their funds - a counselor told me that it may take them to receive their funds from the Gov't in 10-12 months. Some deaf people were complaints about waitin' tooo long. Their names are still on the waitin' list.

Same idea with Social Security - it will run dry in the near future and, how could the disabled/blind/deaf/crippled people support themselves without SS checks ? Will the Gov't let them die by drainin' them without an assistance ?

I would imagine that the "future" is not goin' to be very bright for everyone to face. :(
 
CyberRed said:
I believe it will happen to our country - right here in this USA in the future. The Gov't couldn't afford all disabled/blind/deaf/crippled people to access their rights to meet their needs. Like for example : I learned that DVR/VR counselors have to wait for their funds from the Gov't before they could process to help disabled/deaf/blind/crippled people to get job/attend college for career/ or set up their own business.

I just visited one of DVR/VR offices and questioned them about their funds - a counselor told me that it may take them to receive their funds from the Gov't in 10-12 months. Some deaf people were complaints about waitin' tooo long. Their names are still on the waitin' list.

Same idea with Social Security - it will run dry in the near future and, how could the disabled/blind/deaf/crippled people support themselves without SS checks ? Will the Gov't let them die by drainin' them without an assistance ?

I would imagine that the "future" is not goin' to be very bright for everyone to face. :(

Well, my disability organization is going to fight against Medicaid (federal government) because they are cutting down budget and if we need some equipment, then Medicaid would send us to nursing homes. We're going to stop them from trying to send us to nursiing homes since we deserve to have freedom and do whatever we want to become equal just like everyone else.
 
I do not believe that a "disability" like deafness should be a valid ground for denying a person citizenship into a country. I understand that it may seem such a burden on their government, but they need to change their point of views towards the deaf people and start viewing them as productive members of the society rather than refusing to hire them for jobs and so on.
 
kuifje75 said:
I do not believe that a "disability" like deafness should be a valid ground for denying a person citizenship into a country. I understand that it may seem such a burden on their government, but they need to change their point of views towards the deaf people and start viewing them as productive members of the society rather than refusing to hire them for jobs and so on.

yes you're right and the government should care more about the disabled and they can't just only focus on helping the elderly live independently and the disabled deserve to be treated like human beings.
 
"Deaf children are considered a potential burden because of the need for surgery and cochlear implants."

A need for cochlear implants???
 
kuifje75 said:
I do not believe that a "disability" like deafness should be a valid ground for denying a person citizenship into a country. I understand that it may seem such a burden on their government, but they need to change their point of views towards the deaf people and start viewing them as productive members of the society rather than refusing to hire them for jobs and so on.

It's very sad that this child's life was given very low value by her parents based on her deafness.

I agree with you, and I want to add to that point that deaf people may want to look into making their attitudes more productive as well. *grin* Although deaf children may not have a choice in this matter about their standing in a government. :(

I am sending VR emails about my short term and long term goals, and what I know I can do. I also am honest about my limitations (conventional communication is obviously out of the question for me) AND how I can work around them successfully. I have made proposals that I feel are reasonable on this. I also explained that I do not have a solid grip on norsk, so I realize that I may be coming off too strongly and that was not the intent. If the productive stuff is counteracted with negativity from potential employers, they may be the ones having the problem & you may want to remind them of ADA.

As for having a productive attitude, I think government officials tend to be nervous around foreigners who don't display a positive attitude be they hearing or deaf.

It could be other factors, too, like the burden thing as mentioned in the quoted portion above. Doesn't mean it's an appriopiate motive, I agree. What would be a good solution in this case?
 
Reba said:
"Deaf children are considered a potential burden because of the need for surgery and cochlear implants."

A need for cochlear implants???

My thoughts EXACTLY!!! Since when did CI's becoming necessary? They are an OPTION, that's IT.

CYBERRed said:
Same idea with Social Security - it will run dry in the near future and, how could the disabled/blind/deaf/crippled people support themselves without SS checks ? Will the Gov't let them die by drainin' them without an assistance ?
Um... okay, maybe I misunderstood you... but not all "disabled" people need Social Security. There are plenty of deaf/blind/wheelchair-using people that can and do find jobs and don't need the support of the government. Way too many people abuse the system. I'm not saying that it isn't harder for "disabled" people to get jobs, mostly due to the ignorance of society, but way too many collect SSDI that don't need it.
 
Reba said:
"Deaf children are considered a potential burden because of the need for surgery and cochlear implants."

A need for cochlear implants???
I was born deaf and I've been deaf for 21 years even though I can barely hear anything without my hearing aid so I don't really need the cocolear implant but I would WANT it to hear better.

I know a whole lot of deaf people who are deaf, and only speak in ASL don't even have on a coclear implant and they seem to be doing just fine.
 
rjr2006 said:

Well, my disability organization is going to fight against Medicaid (federal government) because they are cutting down budget and if we need some equipment, then Medicaid would send us to nursing homes. We're going to stop them from trying to send us to nursiing homes since we deserve to have freedom and do whatever we want to become equal just like everyone else.

I didn't know about the Medicaid would send wheel-chaired people to nursin' homes, if wheel-chaired people need some equipment. Thanks for tellin' me. I don't think it is fair.
Very true about deservin' to have freedom and be an equal just like everyone else. I am hopin' that there's enough voice to fight for and help disabled/blind/deaf/wheel-chaired people to deserve what they really need - to help them to be independent.

I just couldn't believe how they treated that South African girl. I find this very unjustice. I believe there's always other options.
 
I agree about the objections to the statement of '..the need for surgery and cochlear implants.' - it's simply an option for one who wishes to have one. It's not forced onto the individuals not wanting cochlear implants. It's the individual's decision on whether he/she wants one or not.
 
That's so outraging... the government need to get their heads hit. Deaf people might be burdened for the budget, but come on, it is so ridiculous. I recall the news that NZ govt claim to tell the public that they are very fair on all people who are granted to access for health care system fairly including deaf/blind/disabled people. I dont think that will happen to this world because we are still considered as underclass. It's unfair that government had add the pressure to the family which influence their actions.

I'm deeply saddening about that deaf people still are treated unfairly by the governments. I hope that in future, the government should think again about the result of their action and change their ways for better future.
 
Sigh... yeah, like you all, I am in a shock too. I couldn't believe that this would happen in todays' age in New Zealand.

The biotechnology sector has alot to answer for.

Is this the beginning of countries starting to tighten up on its health funding dollars by excluding such 'potential burdens'? and could it be the beginning of Adults with CI's being stopped from Immigrating to other countries in future?

Yes, there has been quite some debate over this incident in NZ, hopefully there will be a positive outcome in some way.

I wish I could post more on this here... but am buggared from all the email discussions on this over the weekend...
 
Back
Top