purplecatty
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 3,792
- Reaction score
- 7
Last Thursday, Aug. 27th, I received text from my friend at County Courthouse where he is a mailroom clerk. He told me that he is thinking about asking HR for VP in his office (he have TTY). I congrat and encourage him to do so. I gave him ZBusiness Solution number. But my gut feeling that he may not pass it to HR. After that I decide to look up County HR office online and found the number. I called and asked if they knew him and his co worker at mailroom. She said yes. So I explained that he is thinking about VP and I am his friend and I wanted to help him. I gave her ZBusiness solution ph number and she told me that IT dept take cares of it so she transfer call to County IT office and spoke with man name Jason. I explained him like previously said and told him that ZVRS have integrated VP and easy configer firewall. I also said that TTY are obsolete and 90% of deaf population in USA now have VP. Its ADA law require to provide one for deaf mailroom clerk. I kept conversation short and sweet. He will see to that and thanked me. About 15 min later my friend texted me asking why I am crazy to call HR office. I said Nah nothing serious but simply gave them ph number and explaination.
He took pix of Email and sent thru text but pix was fuzzy. So he decide to print out and send me mail. I got his mail today and opened up letter. It was a cut out Email message from HR dept. I was floored what they said. I find it very opressive to my friend. It was cold!!
I did not have it with me, left the cut out home while I am at work typing topic. As far as I can remember:
""Some vendor called and suggested Captioned Screen phone for hearing Impaired employee. We have provided TTY for employees to use. We will not accept Vendor. Until Technology Improved, I would wait.""
Damn!!! That's hurtful and opressive. They seem putting walls on my friend already and planning on preventing him from requesting VP at work. They twisted around my wordings VP into Captioned Video Screen. I DID not say that! I TOLD them Video Phone !! Since that County is part of Govt and they should obey ADA law regardless and must provide him VP when requested. I am keeping this cutout as an evidence against County Govt
Why?? I did jumped in and help... You may think I was barging in and throw them cold water. Probably YES in your opinion. I am outspoken deaf man and don't like opression from Hearing at work. I fights my way thru until I get it or until there is no way to win it.
BECAUSE-- I knew my friend all my life and he was never outspoken. He is quiet and reserved guy and afraid to speak out to his boss or HR. He know that he have rights but whenever Hearing employees tells him, he tend to own it up and swallow it (nodding , ok ok). But when come to his home and I visit, he was upset and complained that he can't have it or do that just because they told him no. I felt real bad for him.
So since that HR and IT dept put wall up on my friend thus trapping them into opressive control. He wants VP at work.. I can go no further and I wonder is there a way around to force County into submission from outside? Like contacting Capitol of State, Local Reprensative ect....
Remind you that this week Deaf Protest is about equal rights.
If you do cares what you read what happened above because I guarantee that similiar situation elsewhere in USA which hurts deaf employees who have desire to have VP or Visual equipments in their workfloor or office.
Can you help me ??? Suggestions???
Sent from my SM-G900P using AllDeaf App mobile app
He took pix of Email and sent thru text but pix was fuzzy. So he decide to print out and send me mail. I got his mail today and opened up letter. It was a cut out Email message from HR dept. I was floored what they said. I find it very opressive to my friend. It was cold!!
I did not have it with me, left the cut out home while I am at work typing topic. As far as I can remember:
""Some vendor called and suggested Captioned Screen phone for hearing Impaired employee. We have provided TTY for employees to use. We will not accept Vendor. Until Technology Improved, I would wait.""
Damn!!! That's hurtful and opressive. They seem putting walls on my friend already and planning on preventing him from requesting VP at work. They twisted around my wordings VP into Captioned Video Screen. I DID not say that! I TOLD them Video Phone !! Since that County is part of Govt and they should obey ADA law regardless and must provide him VP when requested. I am keeping this cutout as an evidence against County Govt
Why?? I did jumped in and help... You may think I was barging in and throw them cold water. Probably YES in your opinion. I am outspoken deaf man and don't like opression from Hearing at work. I fights my way thru until I get it or until there is no way to win it.
BECAUSE-- I knew my friend all my life and he was never outspoken. He is quiet and reserved guy and afraid to speak out to his boss or HR. He know that he have rights but whenever Hearing employees tells him, he tend to own it up and swallow it (nodding , ok ok). But when come to his home and I visit, he was upset and complained that he can't have it or do that just because they told him no. I felt real bad for him.
So since that HR and IT dept put wall up on my friend thus trapping them into opressive control. He wants VP at work.. I can go no further and I wonder is there a way around to force County into submission from outside? Like contacting Capitol of State, Local Reprensative ect....
Remind you that this week Deaf Protest is about equal rights.
If you do cares what you read what happened above because I guarantee that similiar situation elsewhere in USA which hurts deaf employees who have desire to have VP or Visual equipments in their workfloor or office.
Can you help me ??? Suggestions???
Sent from my SM-G900P using AllDeaf App mobile app