bbaseballboy123
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 515
- Reaction score
- 2
Wirelessly posted
i agree with iowaboy. The reason i went with AB was that i believe they are technically superior but also, the way the company works. When i spoke to the cochlear reps, it was all about the "perks" and not aout the technology. AB sent me information, including three INDEPENDANT studies showing that AB users do better.
also, the t-mic is for real. It is the location of the t-mic that matters, not the fact that there are two mics. And no, cochlear can not move their mic, it is patented.
also, cochlear has been using the same speech processing technology for many years. They have had processor upgrades, but where is the upgrade in actual hearing??? Who cares what it looks like?! Who cares how small the battery is?! I care how well my daughter hears! Hifidelity 120 is an amazing software. My daughter switched from traditional speech processing (like the other companies use) to the 120 and the difference was amazing!
also, cochlear was fined for kickbacks to doctors, so if you are annoyed by unethical ads...
Thank you for backing up the t-mic. I have found it very useful and sounds much better than headpiece mic and "on the" processor mics.
I am under my mother's insurgence which has a great policy since shes a full time working nurse so money is not really an issue. I was approve two years ago for my left side implant, after surgy bills came out to be over $70k, which we only paid $200 for the operation.It would be easier to learn ASL. probably cheaper, and you dont get to see all the doctors.
Just saying.
And I can't live without an implant. I been using implants all my life and have easily adapted to the lifestyle. That would mean going to a different school and not be in the mainstream as much. The reason why I have not learned sign is because I know no one (besides my hearing impaired teacher) that uses ASL.
Plus, I dont mind seeing my doctor every 6-9 months to get a remap. Its not that biggie.