Convicted Animal Abuser Gets Abused Dog Back

pek1

New Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
3,991
Reaction score
0
Convicted Animal Abuser Gets Abused Dog Back - News Story - WLWT Cincinnati

OXFORD, Ohio -- A man who was convicted of animal cruelty will be allowed to get his dog back, but he must follow a list of conditions to care for the animal.

Otis Clark, of Oxford, pleaded no contest last month to charges related to the abuse of his 2-year-old dog, China, and he petitioned to get it back.

The dog was found with a chain so deeply imbedded in its neck, it required surgery to remove it.

Judge Robert Lyons allowed Clark to care for the dog, provided that it is licensed and is not tied up.

Read the judge's requirements

The dog also must be checked every 90 days by a veterinarian, and if Clark does not comply with the judge’s orders he will be considered in violation of his probation.

Clark must read a book on dog care given to him by the court and is subject to random home visits by a probation officer.

If he violates the terms of his probation, Clark must forfeit the dog and would face up to 180 days in jail.

Animal activists are angry that Clark was able to get the dog back, blaming the prosecutor and judge for engaging in a "closed door" deal with Clark.

Butler County Prosecutor Robin Piper said Monday afternoon that he would refer the case to the appellate division in hopes of having the decision overturned.

I believe everyone deserves a second chance, but this guy I seriously question whether he will do the right thing and treat China like the lady she is. Perhaps what should have been done is to tie a chain around Clark's neck, tighten it and see how he likes it.
 
Convicted Animal Abuser Gets Abused Dog Back - News Story - WLWT Cincinnati

OXFORD, Ohio -- A man who was convicted of animal cruelty will be allowed to get his dog back, but he must follow a list of conditions to care for the animal.

Otis Clark, of Oxford, pleaded no contest last month to charges related to the abuse of his 2-year-old dog, China, and he petitioned to get it back.

The dog was found with a chain so deeply imbedded in its neck, it required surgery to remove it.

Judge Robert Lyons allowed Clark to care for the dog, provided that it is licensed and is not tied up.

Read the judge's requirements

The dog also must be checked every 90 days by a veterinarian, and if Clark does not comply with the judge’s orders he will be considered in violation of his probation.

Clark must read a book on dog care given to him by the court and is subject to random home visits by a probation officer.

If he violates the terms of his probation, Clark must forfeit the dog and would face up to 180 days in jail.

Animal activists are angry that Clark was able to get the dog back, blaming the prosecutor and judge for engaging in a "closed door" deal with Clark.

Butler County Prosecutor Robin Piper said Monday afternoon that he would refer the case to the appellate division in hopes of having the decision overturned.

I believe everyone deserves a second chance, but this guy I seriously question whether he will do the right thing and treat China like the lady she is. Perhaps what should have been done is to tie a chain around Clark's neck, tighten it and see how he likes it.

Damn it.. he does not deserve having his dog back....
 
Oh Boy .. but I knew they will keep checking them all the time! :)
 
oh man that sucks GRR

but good thing they are checking the dog up to see if that man is following up and take care of that dog if not he is in trouble again
 
Damn, that's fucked up. Why would they do that? Jeez...
 
Damn, that's fucked up. Why would they do that? Jeez...


Two reasons that I can think of . . . one might be because, ah . . . you'd censor me if I said it, as this is fairly a family forum/thread; the other reason might be because the defendent cried crocodile tears to the judge. :cry::cry::cry:
 
:pissed::rifle::rl::fu2::madfawk:

This guy is an animal abuser and does not deserve to get his dog back! The dog should have gone to a loving home with loving folks who will lavish the dog with lots of love and attention!!!!!!!!!!
 
:pissed::rifle::rl::fu2::madfawk:

This guy is an animal abuser and does not deserve to get his dog back! The dog should have gone to a loving home with loving folks who will lavish the dog with lots of love and attention!!!!!!!!!!

Welcome back, Lucia! Haven't heard from you for a long time . . . is everything okay?
 
Welcome back, Lucia! Haven't heard from you for a long time . . . is everything okay?

Yeah, things are okay, just dealing with some medical problems, etc. And also I don't come by AD that much since there are some really immature people on here that annoys me.
 
man thats fucked up.. i cant believe the judge would let the abuser get the abused dog back? im sure the guy would mess up and have to let the dog go and dog will be given to loving home.. I pray...
 
Most likely a lawyer with their tricks is what made this happen. Geeze... What's wrong with this picture? I would be willing to bet this guy ends up in jail for abusing his poor dog again.
 
Another reason ..

Could another reason be of over crowded animal kennels and
shortage funds to care for the abused animals? Just a thought.
 
OK how is it that animal abusers get their animals back but parents who abuse their children usually don't get their kids back? I know my dogs are like my babbies and animals feel pain and have feelings and scares just like kids do so why let the dog go back?
 
I don't understand it either. I think that man should NEVER get his dog back! :pissed:
 
OMG - whos half-baked idea was this?? You know I love dogs, especially Labs, but when I got in a position where I was no longer able to care for them properly - I found them good loving homes knowing full and well I was never going to get them back.

Why cant people just do the right thing and face up to the reality that, hey we cannot care for an animal right now, lets do the right thing and give this animal a proper loving home with someone who is financially and physically able to care for an animal.

As for the guy getting his dog back - unbelievable. Id like to know who the judge is to that case.
 
Back
Top