The Iowa Supreme Court ruled unanimously Friday that the state’s 11-year-old law limiting marriages to a man and a woman runs counter to the state constitution, making Iowa the third state in the nation—and first in the Midwest—to legalize gay marriage.
The Hawkeye state joins Massachusetts and Connecticut in recognizing same-sex marriage. The court’s 7-0 decision stated that the “The primary constitutional principle at the heart of this case is the doctrine of equal protection” and that “equal protection can only be defined by the standards of each generation.”
Although there have already been numerous requests for marriage permits from eager same-sex couples, the court’s ruling will not be finalized for 21 days, leaving time for opponents to file a request for a rehearing.
Iowa’s senior U.S. senator, Republican Charles Grassley, who has spoken out in the past against gay marriage, would not comment on the court ruling because “it’s a state issue,” an aide said.
The state’s other senator, Democrat Tom Harkin, released a statement saying, “My personal view has been that marriage is between a man and a woman, and I have voted in support of that concept” but said he “will respect and support that decision and I hope that other Iowans can do the same.
“I know that this decision will be very hard for many to accept but I also know that it will provide many committed same sex couples and families important rights, as well as an important sense of recognition and belonging,” Harkin said.
U.S. Rep. Tom Latham, whose district stretches across north and central Iowa, said was “disappointed” in the courts ruling, adding, “ I expect the Iowa Legislature to address this issue before they adjourn for the year.”
Republican Rep. Steve King, who represents the western part of the state, called the decision “an experiment in social engineering” and said the state legislature should pass marriage licensing laws “so Iowa doesn’t become the gay marriage Mecca.”
In his statement, King also called the decision “an unconstitutional ruling and another example of activist judges molding the Constitution to achieve their personal political ends.
“If judges believe the Iowa legislature should grant same sex marriage, they should resign from their positions and run for office, not legislate from the bench,” he said.
In Washington, Joe Solmonese, president of The Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights group, welcomed the decision, saying the court “did its job by recognizing that gay and lesbian couples who form committed relationships and loving families deserve the same level of respect afforded to heterosexual couples.”
Besides legalized gay marriage in Massachusetts and Connecticut, several other states have taken steps to provide benefits to same-sex couples. Civil unions have been approved in New Hampshire and New Jersey, and New York recognizes same-sex marriages done in other states. In Vermont, the state House of Representatives is considering a bill that would legalize same-sex marriage
Iowa Becomes First Midwest State to Allow Same-Sex Marriage - Washington Wire - WSJ