College Cracks Down On Cross Dressing.

deafskeptic

Active Member
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
14,491
Reaction score
11
ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- An all-male college in Atlanta, Georgia, has banned the wearing of women's clothes, makeup, high heels and purses as part of a new crackdown on what the institution calls inappropriate attire.
William Bynum says he discussed the new dress-wearing ban policy with Morehouse's campus gay organization.

William Bynum says he discussed the new dress-wearing ban policy with Morehouse's campus gay organization.

No dress-wearing is part of a larger dress code launched this week that Morehouse College is calling its "Appropriate Attire Policy."

The policy also bans wearing hats in buildings, pajamas in public, do-rags, sagging pants, sunglasses in class and walking barefoot on campus.

However, it is the ban on cross-dressing that has brought national attention to the small historically African-American college.

The dress-wearing ban is aimed at a small part of the private college's 2,700-member student body, said Dr. William Bynum, vice president for Student Services.

"We are talking about five students who are living a gay lifestyle that is leading them to dress a way we do not expect in Morehouse men," he said.

Before the school released the policy, Bynum said, he met with Morehouse Safe Space, the campus' gay organization.

"We talked about it and then they took a vote," he said. "Of the 27 people in the room, only three were against it."

There has been a positive response along with some criticism throughout the campus, he said.

Senior Devon Watson said he disagrees with parts of the new policy, especially those that tell students what they should wear in free time outside of the classroom.

"I feel that there will be a lot of resentment and backlash," Watson said. "It infringes on the student's freedom of expression. I matriculated successfully for three-and-half years dressing so how is this a problem?"

Senior Tyrone McGowan said he has mixed feelings about parts of the policy.

"But I have been inspired by the conversation it has created," he said. "We have to find a way to create diverse leaders from this college. I don't want this to place all of us in one box."

Those breaking the policy will not be allowed to go to class unless they change. Chronic dress-code offenders could be suspended from the college.

Bynum said the policy comes from the vision of the college's president, who wants the institution to create leaders like notable graduates Martin Luther King Jr., actor Samuel Jackson and film director Spike Lee.

Senior Cameron Titus applauds the change.

"The policy is just saying that you have to show more respect in how you dress and there are things that are just not acceptable at Morehouse," Titus said. "We have a legacy that we are trying to uphold."


So then RuPaul wouldn't be wanted as alumni? While I think it's great that this college wants to create leaders like MLK jr, Spike Lee and Samuel Jackson and they are it's alumni, I am a bit troubled by it's stance toward the transgendered.

Photo of RuPaul in Wiki: guy in bold makeup, enormous afro style blond wig, and dress in a bold print.
 
Last edited:
Why is it so unacceptable? What legacy is this that is so important that you can't care enough about your students' gender identities?

:mad2:
 
Morehouse College is mostly blacks and more open, I don't know why they banned on cross dress and I'm personally don't like cross dress so no offense.
 
Even if I didn't personally like cross dressing, it wouldn't be my place to enforce that rule on everyone else.
 
Ban dresses for everyone. No dresses no matter your gender. The students can all dress alike and eliminate gendered attire.

Notice how "leadership" is the province of males, preferably white males?
 
Yes, ban dresses for all. Some of young girls wear dresses that are very distracting, not appropriate for "leaders" either.

Sallylou, I did not even realize the "male leadership" slant on the story until you pointed that out. Good post, and good eye.
 
This would be something to complain about if it were a state school and they were infringing on their students freedoms, however it's not a state school but a private school and they're free to enforce whatever rules they see fit.

Yes, ban dresses for all. Some of young girls wear dresses that are very distracting, not appropriate for "leaders" either.

Sallylou, I did not even realize the "male leadership" slant on the story until you pointed that out. Good post, and good eye.

It's an all-male school so that's not an issue.
 
It's a Private School, they make the rules......

I remmy last year, (public school)...there was one boy who dressed in tight mini-skirts, soft-soled girls shoes, pocketbook and acted so very sissified. He was ridiculed everyday....beat on, spat on....etc., etc.

I can't imagine the emotional abuse this kid has had....but it seems to me that he could be more discreet until he has a gender change. His parents should be more involved in his everyday life. He had been sent home to change clothes a few times, my son told me, but basically, they just left him alone and laughed at him.
 
All-male. Can't distract any future leaders with people with lady bits.

I was speaking generally, though. Rarely do you hear women referred to as leaders and then they're a bitches.
 
Private means they paid for the school? They have rights too. But, if private school, they signed in knowing the rules. Best maybe to petition to change rules or change schools. I believe everyone has the right to dress within reason. No improper "bits" showing, no problem.

If they are transgendered, they are young ladies if they want to be. Just my opinion. If they dress nicely, that is appropriately for class, what is the issue? Yes, it's a guy school. Can they have it both ways? (dont go there - you know what I mean) Who says that guys cant wear dresses? Kilts? Women wear pants and suits if they choose. So what?
 
Private means they paid for the school? They have rights too. But, if private school, they signed in knowing the rules. Best maybe to petition to change rules or change schools. I believe everyone has the right to dress within reason. No improper "bits" showing, no problem.

If they are transgendered, they are young ladies if they want to be. Just my opinion. If they dress nicely, that is appropriately for class, what is the issue? Yes, it's a guy school. Can they have it both ways? (dont go there - you know what I mean) Who says that guys cant wear dresses? Kilts? Women wear pants and suits if they choose. So what?

Those are my feelings as well.

Perhaps RuPaul isn't the right example as he's outrageous (like a proper drag queen should be but then I'm biased toward flamboyant styles of both genders.) and it's my understanding he does this for performances. Dunno if he dresses like this offstage. I don't think he's gay like Boy George.
 
I would understand all girs/all boys schools...but all boys/girls colleges? That's alittle weird if u ask me.

I'm glad I NEVER went to an all boys school...it would be VERY weird without any girls around.
 
Yes this is a private institution so they can make their own rules and standards. Yes it is all male- so of course the references are to the alumni (ALL MALE) whom have gained fame. I don't see the reason to convolute the article's point into ones own mission that females and non caucasion persons can be successful too.
 
Many prominent figures. like Spike Lee, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, Samuel Jackson, Maynard Jackson, etc went to Morehouse. Bill Cosby is one of the major supporters of the college. They are probably OK with it.

I suppose other private, non-coed colleges, such as Spelman College will soon follow Morehouse. :shrug:
 
It's probably a great institution but shouldn't all students be able to enjoy being a part of that institution without having to compromise their gender identity? Sure they signed up for the rules, but that doesn't mean they signed up for being discriminated against. Kudos to them for trying to stand up for what they believe in.
 
This is about gender. The students excluded identify as female and want to be able wear dresses. The college is enforcing rigid gender roles. The message is that transgendered people can't be leaders. I admire the students who stood up for the transgendered. I'm always happy to see anyone stand up for a marginalized group.
 
I remember a young male hearing student sat with me on a shuttle bus on RIT campus. He wore a woman's dress that made me embarrassed in bunch of RIT students to look at us on the bus. It was not a prank or joke. Gee. Poor him because his mind probably was screwed up. I don't know him, and I hope that his life is okay since then.
 
ok, just on a personal level here.. my glbt friends, the guys that is, dress up in dresses waaayyy better than I do. They look a heck of a lot nicer too. They dress tastefully, appropriately and have better color coordination. They are better at being "ladies", aaannnnddd they can kick butt and never take off the heels. Why? They are smart.

Not everyone who crossdresses is glbt. Some are pranksters. All I am saying is that my guy friends look better in dresses and makeup than I do. 99.9 percent of the time no one knows there is a difference.

I cant judge what happened at the school. Were they rowdy pranksters? Were they dressed like "hoochies"? Was it a frat prank? If these guys look and act like the crossdressers that I know, the prof should be happy to have intelligent, articulate, well dressed folks in class.

If they can pick on one group, they have license to pick on all groups. If these guys had any other issue, such as "deaf not allowed terp"' or "WC user cant go to class due to stairs and no ramps" or if was race related, betcha somone would be screaming. I just dont think we should pick on folks for their clothing, especially if they reflect the culture. Such as my foster parent wearing traditional First People's braids or feathered earings to a funeral or wedding. So what??? Yes, glbt have a culture.
 
Back
Top