jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
Sorry to burst your bubble but it hasnt worked for all implanted children. What happens? They become delayed in language due to not having a visual access to language. U can tell me over and over again the same thing but I will never believe it until all deaf children have full access to language and dont end up with language delays. This is going to be my view and I will always stick to it..I believe in giving all children all tools not just one. Until then, it is still playing Russian Roulette.
Agreed. The one most important variable that the oralists continue to leave out is the child themselves. Magnuson (2000), Laybert & Hondt (2003), Evans (2004), Azar, (1998), LaSasso (2002), Marschark, Rhoten, & Fabich (2006), Miyamoto, et.al. (2003), Mukari, et.al. (2007), Priesler, et.al. (2002), Damen, et.al. (2006), and Peterson, (2004) are but a few of the researchers who agree that the children who perform best are those exposed to both sign and speech.
Likewise, the research in the OP dealt with a small sample of postlingually deafened adults. It simply isn't applicable to prelingually deafened children.