- Joined
- Jan 13, 2004
- Messages
- 31,020
- Reaction score
- 10
No No. You are wrong. Far before it happened, Bush and Osama bin Laden were oil stock partners for a long time. Somehow, they didn't agree and do not along with each other. It has nothing to do with the 9/11, but Osama knew that Bush would win his election so it made him so angry. Actually, Bush Sr. started the problem. In complex situation, Osama planned that Iraq would attack Saudi property for oil so that it convinced Bush Sr. to send U.S. troops to protect Saudi which made other countries pissed off. Osama succeeded his plans. Please think about between Bush and Osama - the stock investors. I think that you get the ideas of this progress of the attacks. Bush Jr. was the responsible for more attacks on Iraq after they captured Saddam. It is a huge mess because 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq are very different situation. Don't forgot that Osama was thrown out of Saudi Arabia country far before he started the war.
My own opinion is that Saddam started a small war, but he was horrible leader that tormented his own people. U.S. army discovered hundreds of people that buried in the desert. Don't you remember that on the news?
Recently, millions of people watched the 9/11 movie (TV), and Bush's speech interrupted in the middle of that movie. In fact, he knew that everybody are watching that movie, and Bush did it on his purpose to cover some parts of the movie that he does not want you to know about.
Very interesting....
Your post make sense to me... *nodding -
Yes I know Saddam is a horrible man... but Bin Laden?