On sources and the valuation thereof
LOL. Hold on a sec. I'm not disagreeing. I'm on your side.
It's important that we had this possible situation brought to our attention, I'm glad Casperman brought this to our attention. If schools are receiving money for CI referrals, this is an activity that should be stopped immediately.
What Casperman has done is he has acted as a
secondary source of information. In academia and in real life, secondary sources are very important; they keep us aware of things and provide insight into situations that primary sources might not cue us into initially.
However, secondary sources are not as concrete as
primary sources. If we rely on secondary sources, we are more likely to have erroneous or flawed information. After all, when antagonized conservatives say Michael Moore is an "evil robot from Mars bent on world domination" you're hearing it from a secondary source. Michael Moore may or may not indeed be an "evil robot from Mars" but the secondary source is not as valid as actually getting legal proof or as getting photographs of Michael Moore in his robot state. Because Bob Joe cannot get information from primary sources verifying Michael Moore as a robot, Bob Joe sounds like a loony when he makes claims about Michael Moore.
Casperman gave us important information. He has given us a possible lead to a problem with schools being reimbursed for CI referrals. (That is something that would outrage me greatly!) Now the next step is to find a primary source for this. Otherwise we'll be like the people who say Michael Moore is a robot. You see what I'm saying?
Once you have solid primary sources, you can wage a much more effective campaign.