Thanks, I looked at that chart before and it has helped and confused me both.
The only reason AB was off the table was the size of the internal component and it being too big for her. It seems like a lot of people on this forum are really happy with their AB implants.
How do you feel it compares to when you wore hearing aids?
I'm currently wearing a hearing aid in my left ear and cochlear implant in my right. The hearing aid ONLY lets me know that there is sound around. I can't understand speech. I'm only wearing it to get my ear used to sound again in the hopes that I can get an implant on that side as well.
With my cochlear implant, I was able to understand speech immediately without lipreading. It wasn't perfect but I could understand voices.
The internal size really isn't bigger since AB requires a recess to be drilled to keep the internal component in place. Other companies don't do these recesses and are finding that the internal component moves over time and can cause failures.
You can barely feel the "bump" where my implant is.
Each electrode has its own power source (for AB) which makes sounds sound natural and allows for the "virtual" channels.
Aside from size, look at programming strategies, battery options (rechargeable! Ye
Any not killing the planet!), and microphone placement.
Any implant processor that relies to T-coil (which is 70 year old technology and filled with interference) to connect to a phone or fm system is not worth it.
The more natural the microphone placement is, the better users are able to use the design of our ears to pick up sounds.
For ASL, it is great. It isn't the only signed language and not the only way to do things. It has a totally different language structure from English which can make it hard to do simultaneous signing and speaking.
I'm biased, I grew up with TC (total communication) which is ASL in English word order so that one input can clarify the other.