- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
- Reaction score
- 7
You got involved as soon as I posted to drphil and even supported him by stating that there are a few who are anti-Cis. You missed the whole point which was his tendency to label all Deafs as militant which is what I was reacting to and what everyone else was reacting to.
I'm done discussing anything with you nor will I respond to any more of your posts.
For one thing, if drphil doesn't seem to recognize that there is Deaf (vs. deaf) -- which was the last big issue you were upset about, and has made such comments as recently as today, contending that deaf for him = primarily audiological, not necessarily cultural -- how would my statements in this thread (that my daughter is Deaf, not just deaf and that there do exist today self-described Deaf militants) in any way support him? Seems to me I've been positing the opposite of what he says. But then, that wouldn't really fit into your imaginary model of Us vs. Them, would it?
Last edited: