I find this thread rather odd. You are her nanny- not her mother. You really have no business "redirecting" her- unless that means redirecting her from something dangerous or a melt down. You really have no place dictating what she should be interested in or pursue. The other thing that seemed wildly bizarre is that you would equate her interest in CI's and technology as an indicator she might grow up as an Audist.
I was interested in history and WWII when I was a child- that didn't mean I grew up and became a Nazi supporter.
I understand I was wrong now, as I've expressed. But if I had never posted it, I would've never come to realize that. I kind of wish I didn't post it because of the ridicule, but otherwise how could I learn? I heard about C.I.'s because controversial and didn't want her to inadvertently hurt people who felt strongly against it, and it was only a minor concern. I was obviously wrong, so I ask that people realize my thoughts are different now and not to bring it up any further because I feel stupid for it.
As an educator and person in childcare, I do have influence in how a child is raised. Haven't your teachers ever influenced you? And I am an educator because I am a licensed daycare assistant. However, I didn't want to influence her in the wrong way, which is why I brought it up in a forum where everyone is far more knowledgeable about all of this than me. Isn't that the responsible thing to do? I wouldn't have redirected her by telling her that her interest is wrong and putting her down for it. I never believed it was wrong to begin with, but just was worried that it was imbalanced because she didn't care for ASL. Instead, I would have just done little things like shown her kid-appropriate ASL videos on YouTube and such. I was only looking for advice on how to do that, only to find out that I was wrong in my thinking to begin with.
Also, I'm not just a nanny. I've been with this girl for eight years, and her family considers me like a sister to her. Many nannies end up in situations like these and play part in how the child is raised. And I don't do any of this behind her mother's back either.
The mother likely continues with the signing because even though her daughter can speak and has a CI, she is still deaf. Expressively the girl may be able to speak, but that doesn't mean she has complete access to language receptively without sign. Often times kids with oral skills will drop their expressive signs when they are not around other individuals who are deaf because (sometimes) it's easier for them to speak. That doesn't diminish their need for receptive access to language.
Sounds like she has a good mom.
I totally agree. She is a good mom. I was only pointing out the situation because one commenter mentioned that the neighbor must not be signing which is why this girl is not into signing.