Beach girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2011
- Messages
- 3,767
- Reaction score
- 3
Older.
How old were you when you got a CI?
How old were you when you got a CI?
older.
How old were you when you got a ci?
so why subject him to that when it can be prevented?Dispute what? I'm sure he's going to face a tough time as a deaf teenager.
miserable? does it matter? miserable. rough. agonizing. difficult. pick anything that satisfy you.I dispute that he's necessarily going to be "miserable."
'zackly. You don't use one, right?
So why judge this little boy and his family?
Older.
How old were you when you got a CI?
Dispute what? I'm sure he's going to face a tough time as a deaf teenager. I dispute that he's necessarily going to be "miserable."
nope. I've said no such thing.So you think his life will be better without a CI, with no ability to hear anything at all?
This conversation just seems to be going in circles. Jiro agreed that no, it would not be better to not be able to hear at all.
why do you bother asking this same question over and over again? our answer remains same. I've posted links above for you to reread threads that you've already participated in. Feel free to re-read our answers in there.So what would be the alternative, then? If this little boy was a candidate for a CI, then clearly hearing aids would not have helped him. His parents had two options: give him a CI, and some hearing, (albeit not really natural, and not like a hearing person's hearing), and continue with English, Spanish, and ASL...
or -
give him nothing at all, let him grow up only with ASL, no access to hearing, and a much tougher time learning Spanish and English.
And I guess that's what you are saying would be preferable?
At any rate, reading the comments from what appears to be his father under the second video, posted just a week ago, his family is very happy with his progress and says he is happy and learning more all the time. If they are happy, and the child is happy and learning, that's all to the good, right?
If he should decide at some point he doesn't want to hear, he can choose that. But if the reverse were true, if they didn't give him access to some hearing, he could never go back and have this period of childhood language acquisition all over again.
So you think his life will be better without a CI, with no ability to hear anything at all?
This conversation just seems to be going in circles. Jiro agreed that no, it would not be better to not be able to hear at all.
So what would be the alternative, then? If this little boy was a candidate for a CI, then clearly hearing aids would not have helped him. His parents had two options: give him a CI, and some hearing, (albeit not really natural, and not like a hearing person's hearing), and continue with English, Spanish, and ASL...
or -
give him nothing at all, let him grow up only with ASL, no access to hearing, and a much tougher time learning Spanish and English.
And I guess that's what you are saying would be preferable?
At any rate, reading the comments from what appears to be his father under the second video, posted just a week ago, his family is very happy with his progress and says he is happy and learning more all the time. If they are happy, and the child is happy and learning, that's all to the good, right?
If he should decide at some point he doesn't want to hear, he can choose that. But if the reverse were true, if they didn't give him access to some hearing, he could never go back and have this period of childhood language acquisition all over again.
As long as he is exposed to ASL and interacts with the Deaf community, then he will most likely not have all the issues many of us experienced growing up in a restricitve hearing-only environment.
Nope, no chance of that.
(Woops - that was response to Jiro.)
Oh ok. I hadn't seen that one before. Thanks. (It's the same number of letters and punctuation?)
It's just slang, not for formal communication.