I omitted the word, "yet" because it is not part of the ADA and is in your words. In quoting law, one needs to refer exactly what the law says and not take away from it.
People can buy vests online and have their dog wear it, but if the dog misbehaves (sniffing others or store items, begs for food, barks, etc) the owner of the establishment has the right to refuse entry. Plus, those people who "cheat" and try to bring a non-trained "pet" claiming its a service dog jeopardize the rights and priveleges of those of us with trained, well-behaved helpers.
Misbehavior of a service animal would be much more severe than just sniffing. Not only is Snickers my hearing dog, but I trust her 100 percent if she smells something wrong. So, in your words, if a dog is trained to smell smoke, the animal would be banned.
Second, which is proper: its (example: its mother) or it's (it is)? You had the second one and I corrected it. Be sure how to write the proper possessive. As for the cheating people, a true service dog team most definately can turn them in to the police, thus getting the business off the hook for "being the bad guy" for doing it. I would do it in a heartbeat if I spotted a fake "service dog team."[/QUOTE]
Can only a true service dog team turn in those people who are "imposters". I would think anyone who knows what they're talking about can do that. If this is the case. But then, what about therapy dogs, who train and train, and provide a service to MANY people, yet still have no public access rights. I think that's sad.
I also think it's sad that Americans in general have dog aversion because of their puritanical leanings. All this health inspector shit makes no sense. Rats and roaches are known to frequent even the cleanest restaurant's kitchens, yet a clean healthy dog, who remains on the floor, cannot even be in the outdoor seating areas at some restaurants.
Last edited: