Wow. Things have gotten a little crazy in here.
To clarify some points - as far as I could tell from reading their website, it seems that it is not uncommon for students, especially entering K or 1st to not be fluent in ASL. While my son is not fluent by any means, he is willing to learn. If he wasn't, or if I thought he or we would have trouble learning ASL, then I would not consider sending him to an ASL school since they say all instruction is done in ASL with speech breakouts. I did read about the "probation period" and I did not know what that entailed. Thank you to the poster that clarified that. It does not seem quite so scary when put that way (making sure they are able to learn ASL).
What makes this the hardest is trying to figure this all out from another state. What I do know is that the public schools in the area we are moving to are awful (West Contra Costa Unified School District). So, we are pretty much looking at CSD or private school, which adds a whole other layer since private schools are not required to accomodate my son in any way shape or form.
Best case scenario? He goes to CSD, learns ASL, is able to gain acceptance into an awesome community, has no further deterioration and is now bilingual and can comfortably live in both worlds.
Worst case scenario? He goes to CSD, learns ASL, is able to gain acceptance into an awesome community, and either his hearing does deteriorate, or he becomes self conscious about his voice quality issues and chooses to communicate using only ASL.
Personally, I can live with either scenario, and I want him to be prepared for both. Because the true worst case scenario is that the latter happens and he is not prepared.
Stepping away from the rant now.
Anyhow, thank you to all of you that have posted. I will update you when I know more.