Breezy
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2004
- Messages
- 280
- Reaction score
- 0
I got my first hearing aid late ,as well. I was 14 at the time.
I got my first when i was 15 and then the other i got when i was......hmmm....18?
I got my first hearing aid late ,as well. I was 14 at the time.
I believe that hearing aids can reduce the hearing ability, and it does worse if went high volume than average.
I went to see an audiologist last week for a hearing test since I needed a new hearing aid. I was surprised to hear her say that my hearing was getting worse and that I was a possible candidate for cochlear implant. After my next hearing test, the results showed that my hearing aid wasn't any good and that I did worse than without my hearing aid. She then reminded me that it would be a good idea to get cochlear implants. I'm like... WTF!?
I think that she was fiddling with the controls to make me do worse so that she can convince me to get cochlear implants. A friend of mine later told me that this woman as well as the rest of the department... are working with a cochlear implant company. So, they do try to encourage everyone to get cochlear implants. :roll:
...
CI is bad idea for people who are HoH.
Excuse me as I beg to differ! Don't make blanket statements like that without clarifying your remarks. It just depends on the person and what they expect from their hearing in terms of the world at large. For some, it is not a good idea...for others it is a great idea. Each to their own. In my case, it was the best thing I ever done for my hearing...pure and simple.
Excuse me as I beg to differ! Don't make blanket statements like that without clarifying your remarks. It just depends on the person and what they expect from their hearing in terms of the world at large. For some, it is not a good idea...for others it is a great idea. Each to their own. In my case, it was the best thing I ever done for my hearing...pure and simple.
Pac,
If it is your opinion then, preface it with "In my opinion..." and I would had less reason to say anything about it. In any case, note that I wasn't attacking you but disagreeing with you. There is a big difference between the two. To me, an attack is name-calling or a put-down of some sort. I did no such thing but point out why I disagreed with you. If you thought this was an attack, heaven help you when somebody really does!
I have admit that you are loyal with CI? Right?
then... how about expected for HoH to wear HA? Most of them are wear HA and using oral language, and attend regular classes, and some of IEP aren't required.
I don't care if you are disagree about it.
We are talking at cross purposes here. You made a blanket statement that HOH folks shouldn't have a CI. I merely offered a counter argument because it wasn't true. It really depends if they even qualify for one at all. If they don't, then I agree they shouldn't have one and go the HA route if practical. Where it gets hairy, is when they do qualify for a CI. It is in this situation where for one it might be a good thing or a bad thing. This is what I was alluding to for my opinion. Remember one can qualify for a CI and still wear a HA instead. They might decide they do or don't want a CI. Either way is not an issue with me...it is up to them. Hopefully, we can now bury this...
Oh, I hear you. I fucking hate those automated answering machines...whoever invented the automated answering machine should have millions of brazillian fire ants released on her/his body...argh. AND I HATE MAKING RELAY CALLS TOO!
This is the reason why I HATE THE PHONE. I MEAN HATE HATE HATE.:rl: