R
rockdrummer
Guest
I don't want anyone to get the wrong impression from me here. I am all for signing whenever possible especially for those that are learning. It's good exercise. In fact I wish I had more opportunities to sign. My only point is that I don't see why anyone would get offended if spoken language was used in the context of the OP.
I went to a show where my friends band was playing and there were some deaf folks there hands flying. Should I or any hearing person take offense because they were signing. Trust me, there were many hearing people at this event and even if they watched the signing they would not have a clue what the conversation was about. When I went to meet the deaf folks I used my limited skills and discovered that they were able to speak and speechread but they chose to sign instead. Personally I don't see a problem with that and would not take offense to them signing even though they could speak fluently.
When I try to gauge fairness I take the comments and apply them to both sides of the coin.
-At a deaf event its considered rude for hearing people to use spoken language.
-At a hearing event its considered rude for oral deaf to use sign language.
Can you see how unfair holding to that is on either side of the coin?
My position is that it should not be considered rude if at a deaf event hearing people use spoken language when there are no deaf people involved in the conversation. Just as it should not be considered rude if at a hearing event oral deaf use sign language when there are no hearing people involved in the conversation.
I went to a show where my friends band was playing and there were some deaf folks there hands flying. Should I or any hearing person take offense because they were signing. Trust me, there were many hearing people at this event and even if they watched the signing they would not have a clue what the conversation was about. When I went to meet the deaf folks I used my limited skills and discovered that they were able to speak and speechread but they chose to sign instead. Personally I don't see a problem with that and would not take offense to them signing even though they could speak fluently.
When I try to gauge fairness I take the comments and apply them to both sides of the coin.
-At a deaf event its considered rude for hearing people to use spoken language.
-At a hearing event its considered rude for oral deaf to use sign language.
Can you see how unfair holding to that is on either side of the coin?
My position is that it should not be considered rude if at a deaf event hearing people use spoken language when there are no deaf people involved in the conversation. Just as it should not be considered rude if at a hearing event oral deaf use sign language when there are no hearing people involved in the conversation.
Last edited by a moderator: