Army veteran has to pay for his Purple Heart

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reba

Retired Terp
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
54,899
Reaction score
1,518
Army Veteran, Forced To Pay $21 C.O.D. For Purple Heart Medal

War comes with an incalculable human cost. And apparently a shipping fee of about $21.

Retired Sgt. Major Rob Dickerson says that's the price he was forced to pay when his Purple Heart -- the medal issued to soldiers wounded in action -- arrived at his door, C.O.D.

Instead of being awarded the military honor in a formal ceremony, the vet with 29 years in the service was handed his award, and a shipping invoice, by a FedEx deliveryman outside his Sioux Falls, S.D., home.

"Leaders need to pay attention and take care of soldiers," Dickerson told The Huffington Post. "This is a gross injustice."

The shipping-and-handling fiasco was the last aggravation for Dickerson in his four-year quest to get the medal. His story was first reported by Keloland.com.

In 2007, he was a reservist embedded as an advisor to Iraqi soldiers. He was training troops to fight the insurgency, when a rocket exploded nearby and severely injured him.

"It threw me 20, 25 feet in the air -- it just crumpled me," said Dickerson, who said the blow inflicted a traumatic brain injury, shrapnel wounds, injuries to his right shoulder, lower back and neck and nerve damage in his hip.

A Purple Heart should have been easy to obtain. But because Dickerson was serving alongside Iraqi soldiers instead of American forces, no U.S. Army medic was able to issue him a Casualty Feeder Card, a document that "goes up the chain of command and notifies them of American casualties," he said.

"Being with Iraqi soldiers, I had no American medic with me -- and all of my Iraqi comrades with me were killed."

Dickerson says he spent two days in the hospital before returning to duty. But without the document, he couldn't convince Army officials of his merit.

"An American nurse who examined me issued a sworn statement, but that wasn't good enough for my commander in Iraq," he said.

After returning to the United States, Dickerson, who also served in Afghanistan, pursued the medal through the peacetime chain of command. His request was granted, and the Purple Heart was shipped to his home in 2009 -- with a delivery fee.

Army officials were not able to immediately explain how Dickerson wound up paying for his own Purple Heart.

"I'm positive that's not typical," said Army spokesman Troy Rolan.

In an email, Rolan noted that the Army received Dickerson's request in June 2009, reviewed it the following month and shipped the medal in August.

"The normal practice is to send the award to the Soldiers [sic] unit ... It would be up to the unit or Congressional Office to coordinate a ceremony," he wrote. "Unknown why the Soldier was charged postage for shipping."

Dickerson says he initially refused to pay the C.O.D., telling the deliveryman to charge the Army. A week later, FedEx sent him a bill.

He paid that bill and brought the charges to the attention of Army officials. Army brass tried to make it up to by sending an apology and a money order to reimburse him. But in yet another gaffe, Dickerson hasn't been able to cash the money order because it's made out to Roy Dirksen.

It's been nearly two years since Dickerson was forced to pay for his own medal, and he remains frustrated.

After getting word that two other soldiers might find themselves in a similar position, Dickerson says he recently penned a letter to a local newspaper outlining his plight.

"When I was a Sgt. Major, I double-checked and triple-checked everything," he told The Huffington Post. "Mistakes happen. This happened -- so resolve it."

Dickerson hopes to track down other soldiers who find themselves in similar situations and offer his support.

"If they would do it to a Sgt. Major, they'll do it to anybody," he said.

Rob Dickerson, Army Veteran, Forced To Pay $21 C.O.D. For Purple Heart Medal
 
That's crazy! I am not even sure it's even allowed to use C.O.D. on any products.
 
He should have contacted one of his local aldermen. They would get the ball rolling a lot faster in resolving it.
 
He should have contacted one of his local aldermen. They would get the ball rolling a lot faster in resolving it.
Not a local alderman but his state's US Congressmen would be a good idea.

The process usually is, the service member sends a letter to each of his Senators and his District's Representative. The Congressman sends a letter to the commanding officer of the unit involved. A good CO usually gets back to the Congressmen within two-three weeks. The CO better have a satisfactory resolution to the problem in that reply. If it goes beyond 30 days, heads begin rolling.

Not this kind of rolling: :rofl:
 
Your kidding me. wow what a shame on our Govt.
 
Not a local alderman but his state's US Congressmen would be a good idea.

The process usually is, the service member sends a letter to each of his Senators and his District's Representative. The Congressman sends a letter to the commanding officer of the unit involved. A good CO usually gets back to the Congressmen within two-three weeks. The CO better have a satisfactory resolution to the problem in that reply. If it goes beyond 30 days, heads begin rolling.

Not this kind of rolling: :rofl:

beyond 30 days? do Congressmen really keep a tab on it?
 
beyond 30 days? do Congressmen really keep a tab on it?
The command and the Congressmen do. They take Congressional letters seriously. Everything is recorded.
 
Oh wow.. That is so wrong on so many levels.
 
Not a local alderman but his state's US Congressmen would be a good idea.

The process usually is, the service member sends a letter to each of his Senators and his District's Representative. The Congressman sends a letter to the commanding officer of the unit involved. A good CO usually gets back to the Congressmen within two-three weeks. The CO better have a satisfactory resolution to the problem in that reply. If it goes beyond 30 days, heads begin rolling.

Not this kind of rolling: :rofl:

That is what I meant. Contacting the President would be a good idea, too, but the chances of a private citizen being successful is nil. The alderman has an easier time going up the chain than others. He/She could contact a Congressperson who contacts a Senator, etc.
I have done this before.
 
Wirelessly posted (BB Curve 9300)

Before this gets out of hand, let me explain.

The proper and most direct route for a greivance is how I described.

Local officials carry less authority than the military member for contacting a Congressman. That just adds another layer of delay.

The President's staff will just circulate the member's letter back to the appropriate Congressman. That will cause more delay.

Military CO's don't want an unresolved Congressional inquest on their record, so they usually give them administrative priority.
 
Wirelessly posted (BB Curve 9300)

Before this gets out of hand, let me explain.

The proper and most direct route for a greivance is how I described.

Local officials carry less authority than the military member for contacting a Congressman. That just adds another layer of delay.

The President's staff will just circulate the member's letter back to the appropriate Congressman. That will cause more delay.

Military CO's don't want an unresolved Congressional inquest on their record, so they usually give them administrative priority.

I hope this decorated vet takes the option of filing a grievance. It would certainly be deserved.
 
Wirelessly posted (BB Curve 9300)

Before this gets out of hand, let me explain.

The proper and most direct route for a greivance is how I described.

Local officials carry less authority than the military member for contacting a Congressman. That just adds another layer of delay.

The President's staff will just circulate the member's letter back to the appropriate Congressman. That will cause more delay.

Military CO's don't want an unresolved Congressional inquest on their record, so they usually give them administrative priority.

Thanks for the info. What about those no longer in the military?
 
Thanks for the info. What about those no longer in the military?
They can still write to their Congressmen for their grievances. The Congressional staff will forward the letters and the Congressman's request to the appropriate command for action. It's rather routine for the administrative staffs.
 
They can still write to their Congressmen for their grievances. The Congressional staff will forward the letters and the Congressman's request to the appropriate command for action. It's rather routine for the administrative staffs.

Or contact the local aldermen. :P
 
FYI, I personally handled many grievances when attached to a major Navy staff.

A (service member, spouse, mother, father) would contact their congressional district's office by mail, email, or phone call to state their problem. It could be for a mom's deployed son who did not write or call her for some time and she was worried about him. Or, child support, medals not received, paychecks.....

The congressional office would notify the service member's command by official registered mail. A large staff would receive an advanced copy by fax to get a heads up and start on it. If it was a serious issue, a direct phone call.

The command would assign a responsible person to do the investigation and report. Usually the time limit was no more than 2 weeks to respond. Otherwise, letting it drag on would only invite a second and more "serious tone" letter.

If the person was no longer in the military, it was still the command's responsibility to respond by forwarding the congressional letter to another (retired records, VA, etc.) for response with a copy to the congressional office keeping them informed.

U.S. citizens are urged to contact their Representative and/or Senators (all three at the same time is ok). They all have large staffs in D.C. and your state. Happy citizens are VOTES to these people. :)

Filing a complaint to your Aldermen, Mayor, Governor or POTUS will only get it ignored, lost or delayed.
 
It could be for a mom's deployed son who did not write or call her for some time and she was worried about him.

:giggle:

I could imagine my mom would do that dozens of time
 
FYI, I personally handled many grievances when attached to a major Navy staff.

A (service member, spouse, mother, father) would contact their congressional district's office by mail, email, or phone call to state their problem. It could be for a mom's deployed son who did not write or call her for some time and she was worried about him. Or, child support, medals not received, paychecks.....

The congressional office would notify the service member's command by official registered mail. A large staff would receive an advanced copy by fax to get a heads up and start on it. If it was a serious issue, a direct phone call.

The command would assign a responsible person to do the investigation and report. Usually the time limit was no more than 2 weeks to respond. Otherwise, letting it drag on would only invite a second and more "serious tone" letter.

If the person was no longer in the military, it was still the command's responsibility to respond by forwarding the congressional letter to another (retired records, VA, etc.) for response with a copy to the congressional office keeping them informed.

U.S. citizens are urged to contact their Representative and/or Senators (all three at the same time is ok). They all have large staffs in D.C. and your state. Happy citizens are VOTES to these people. :)

Filing a complaint to your Aldermen, Mayor, Governor or POTUS will only get it ignored, lost or delayed.

Dang. Ilive and learn, I guess. I had no idea the military's power transcends those of our elected government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top