People with a license are held accountable through various mechanisms. People without a license, such as yourself, are accountable to no one. Not to the client, not to a licensing board, not to a peer review, not through malpractice review, not to anyone. That is what is frightening. You are held to no professional standards. You can tell anyone anything, and not be held accountable for the recommendations that you make, because you have no professional standards, no ethical guidelines, no minimum eductional requirements, etc., etc., etc.
And the only thing you seem to be able to come up with here is unsubstantiated anecdote. A friend of a friend of a friend told me, but it can't be substantiated because of this reason or that reason. Virtually no accountability. Show me some empirically substantiated data. Show me empirical evidence of harm. Hell, show me some understanding of the theory which you criticize. You post abstracts which support absolutely nothing. Show me some critical analysis using methodolgy. You have failed to answer even the the most elementary questions regarding theory and technique. You have mis-stated and misrepresented even the most elementary aspects of diagnosis and treatment. And you are completely unnaccountable for these errors because you have to answer to no accrediting agency, no licensing board, no academic institution, no IRB.
You continually preface your statements with "I think". Well, what you think, and what can be substantiated with empirical support and valid knowledge and reasoning are two different things. I can think the grass is pink, but unless I can substanitate it, an provide valid support for what I "think", it has absolutely no credibility. And that is where you stand at this point in time.
And the really frightening part of the equation is that you have so many gaps in your reasoning and your knowledge that you don't even see the danger in presenting yourself as an expert in giving such advise.
I have never presented my self as an expert. That is your assumption. If I had, I would not preface my remarks with "I think". And all you have to offer about homeopathy are opinions. Yet your expertise is not in this area. So you have no credibility in it.