Airplane Crash today and is Missing

They were probably hijacked and ordered to make the U-turn to throw everyone off, then forced to make a water landing. After all, very experienced pilot, conveniently enough. They landed near boats and the passengers will be located once the suspects and co-conspirators make their getaway.
At least I hope so.
I don't know; it's not a seaplane.

What would be the purpose in doing that? :confused:
 
I don't know; it's not a seaplane.

What would be the purpose in doing that? :confused:

I just got a gut feeling the are ensuring the passengers do not get hurt. Imagine if that is true.
I hope it doesn't happen that way, because the hijackers would be heroes and legends.
 
I just got a gut feeling the are ensuring the passengers do not get hurt. Imagine if that is true.
I hope it doesn't happen that way, because the hijackers would be heroes and legends.
I mean, what would be the purpose of hijacking the plane in the first place, if they intended to let the passengers go without any payoff or exchange of some kind?
 
I mean, what would be the purpose of hijacking the plane in the first place, if they intended to let the passengers go without any payoff or exchange of some kind?

Winning hearts and minds might be the only purpose.
 
Let's assume the small chance this type of plane lands on the ocean intact, it will only be minutes til it totally sinks. So how long will it take to realistically evacuate 200+ people from it?
 
People are willing to pay millions for passports, particularly U.S. passports, but stolen passports, in general, are big money in the black market. Again, just because passports were stolen, it's not always terrorism related.

I just saw on Nightly News that some counties will not do anything about stolen passports as it help their. economy. I can't post the story is not showing up on their web site. And the airplane where not up front about just much the plane when off course .
 
Winning hearts and minds might be the only purpose.
I still don't understand how anyone could think that kidnapping, endangering, and traumatizing people would win any hearts or minds. Not to mention the anguish that the victims' loved ones experience--that wouldn't endear them.
 
I still don't understand how anyone could think that kidnapping, endangering, and traumatizing people would win any hearts or minds. Not to mention the anguish that the victims' loved ones experience--that wouldn't endear them.

It's along the idea that if you kill for God, He rewards you with sex.


At this point, nothing is being printed but rumors and speculations.
 
I don't know; it's not a seaplane.

What would be the purpose in doing that? :confused:

Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: the conspiracy theories

There all kind of theories coming up about happen and even the news brought that it could had high jacked by a airline passenger(s) .


http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-cockpit-companions/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Did you hear about a passenger saying she was in the cockpit with the missing co pilot ? Now that is very odd that a passenger even being allowed in the cockpit.
 
...Did you hear about a passenger saying she was in the cockpit with the missing co pilot ? Now that is very odd that a passenger even being allowed in the cockpit.
Yes, I did hear that and I thought that was very odd.
 
I find using infopig.com to be useful on picking up tidbits of news. When you pull up the site down below the flags is a list of countries. I chose Malaysia for this. reuters.com and then up at the top there is a choice box for what country. I like UK for international news but there is lots of other ways too.
The turn around was apparently on civilian radar until the transponder and tracking devices shut down. The primary radar for the region is the Malaysian military. Apparently they tracked MH370 to the Straits of Malacca on the west side of Malaysia.

I see there is a bit of doubt cast on this report but it is being checked out.

At any rate if it went to Malacca that is a busy area lots of people on ships and on shore to eyewitness a jet off the normal course. The beaches are accessible and soon debris of aircraft would be showing up if it crashed.
 
I don't know why transponders on civilian aircraft can be disabled manually. Also, there should be a "panic button" that requires only one push in order to send out an automatic multi-spectrum SOS-type signal, hailing for help and broadcasting the aircraft's position.
 
this is all very strange indeed :hmm:

I still think there may have been a high profile passenger aboard.

(I also noticed how Russia's invasion of Ukraine has left the front page of the MSM)
 
You can try to solve the mystery here:

Tomnod


hi definition satellite images of the time the plane went missing.
 
Six important facts you're not being told about lost Malaysia Airlines Flight 370
Fact #3: Many parts of destroyed aircraft are naturally bouyant and will float in water

In past cases of aircraft destroyed over the ocean or crashing into the ocean, debris has always been spotted floating on the surface of the water. That's because -- as you may recall from the safety briefing you've learned to ignore -- "your seat cushion may be used as a flotation device."

Yes, seat cushions float. So do many other non-metallic aircraft parts. If Flight 370 was brought down by an explosion of some sort, there would be massive debris floating on the ocean, and that debris would not be difficult to spot. The fact that it has not yet been spotted only adds to the mystery of how Flight 370 appears to have literally vanished from the face of the Earth.

Fact #4: If a missile destroyed Flight 370, the missile would have left a radar signature

One theory currently circulating on the 'net is that a missile brought down the airliner, somehow blasting the aircraft and all its contents to "smithereens" -- which means very tiny pieces of matter that are undetectable as debris.

The problem with this theory is that there exists no known ground-to-air or air-to-air missile with such a capability. All known missiles generate tremendous debris when they explode on target. Both the missile and the debris produce very large radar signatures which would be easily visible to both military vessels and air traffic authorities.

Fact #5: The location of the aircraft when it vanished is not a mystery

Air traffic controllers have full details of almost exactly where the aircraft was at the moment it vanished. They know the location, elevation and airspeed -- three pieces of information which can readily be used to estimate the likely location of debris.

Remember: air safety investigators are not stupid people. They've seen mid-air explosions before, and they know how debris falls. There is already a substantial data set of airline explosions and crashes from which investigators can make well-educated guesses about where debris should be found. And yet, even armed with all this experience and information, they remain totally baffled on what happened to Flight 370.

Fact #6: If Flight 370 was hijacked, it would not have vanished from radar

Hijacking an airplane does not cause it to simply vanish from radar. Even if transponders are disabled on the aircraft, ground radar can still readily track the location of the aircraft using so-called "passive" radar (classic ground-based radar systems that emit a signal and monitor its reflection).

Thus, the theory that the flight was hijacked makes no sense whatsoever. When planes are hijacked, they do not magically vanish from radar.

Conclusion: Flight 370 did not explode; it vanished

The inescapable conclusion from what we know so far is that Flight 370 seems to have utterly and inexplicably vanished. It clearly was not hijacked (unless there is a cover-up regarding the radar data), and we can all be increasingly confident by the hour that this was not a mid-air explosion (unless debris suddenly turns up that they've somehow missed all along).

The inescapable conclusion is that Flight 370 simply vanished in some way that we do not yet understand. This is what is currently giving rise to all sorts of bizarre-sounding theories across the 'net, including discussions of possible secret military weapons tests, Bermuda Triangle-like ripples in the fabric of spacetime, and even conjecture that non-terrestrial (alien) technology may have teleported the plane away.

Personally, I'm not buying any of that without a lot more evidence. The most likely explanation so far is that the debris simply hasn't been found yet because it fell over an area which is somehow outside the search zone. But as each day goes by, even this explanation becomes harder and harder to swallow.

The frightening part about all this is not that we will find the debris of Flight 370; but rather that we won't. If we never find the debris, it means some entirely new, mysterious and powerful force is at work on our planet which can pluck airplanes out of the sky without leaving behind even a shred of evidence.

If there does exist a weapon with such capabilities, whoever controls it already has the ability to dominate all of Earth's nations with a fearsome military weapon of unimaginable power. That thought is a lot more scary than the idea of an aircraft suffering a fatal mechanical failure.
 
Since the last transmission, it either nosedived/exploded on the spot, or flew below radar detection to any location on the map. HUGE area to look for possible wreckage, even more daunting for sonar detection under water or military units spotting over land and mountain ranges.

0310-web-flight-bathymetry4-ai2html_600.png
 
So far, I have found 4 large sea faring vessels .... they would have had to see a plane crashing into the ocean ... how come none of them were questioned?
 
Back
Top