- Joined
- Nov 7, 2005
- Messages
- 8,727
- Reaction score
- 9
And respectfully, I submit that despite a user's paranoid attacks at anyone who doesn't immediately shout to the heavens about a piece of research, it is absolutely a valid question as to the user's native language. There is simply no use even considering results without this important information, in this particular case.
I have stated many times in the past that I am not against any modality that successfully teaches language, and frankly I'm tired as hell of being accused otherwise. If any highly defensive user wishes to find a quote where I ever said "I am against Cued Speech," I would be MORE than happy to retract it. Since that never happened.
I ask myself why I bother posting in these threads at all, and then I answer "Good question. Time to stop."
I understand where you are coming from. I am not questioning at any statements that were fired in this thread nor I'm not accusing you of anything else. What I am saying is, the language validity is reasonable only if it was supported which it has been in this thread to clear out any of these confusions.