I don't know why you have to constantly remind people that you're gay in every post. It seems to me you're not capable of replying without giving everyone a gay example to illustrate your point. We know you're gay, we've got it by now, we know you're gay...and hearing loss is not the same thing as sex with your partner. I don't see why you keep bringing it up to compare two unrelated subjects. Just because Ambrosia, or anyone else disagrees with you, doesn't mean we're "audists." It means we have a different view point, which everyone is entitled to.
Laura
Thanks! it actually having the state of my hearing being equated with someone's sexual preference weirds me out. I get embracing your deafness. But feeling that hearing is "over rated", when the person has never actually been hearing in the first place sounds like a sense of forced and false pride. that doesn't seem very embracing to me.
It'd be different if this was being said by someone like me, that is late deafened and has experienced being hearing, we can make a comparison of whether or not something is better. If someone has never eaten peas, they can't say carrots taste better than peas, because they don't know what peas taste like.
Somehow I don't think someone who went blind later in life would think being blind is better than being able to see. If they were saying that it would sound like a lot of bluster don't you think?