Whoops, I saw "11 year old".Shimo, that behavioral program is too complicated for an 11 month-old to understand. Ear check-- immediate hug and sticker on the hand.
I saw this problem in church this morning, sent the mom the links for the cap, thread and board. Don't know how much of a loss the child has, or why the left is unaided.
I'm not sure how critical it is for the 11 month old to wear the HA,
Maybe not wearing it will delay/permanently affect the brain's development.
If not, then maybe the kid can wait until he or she can understand.
The kid is ALSO only HOH. She already has quite a bit of residual hearing....and we're talking about not havign the hearing aids SOMETIMES.
As long as a kid gets significent listening time, they will develop speech and listening skills. I just LOVE how people think you have to be all obessive about hearing aids/CIs.
It doesn't matter if "the kid is only HOH"... It is the quality of access to language around them. Just because they may have some residual hearing doesn't mean that they are "hearing" it correctly and in it's entirety.
It is critical that children wear their hearing aids as much as possible during waking hours so that they have the opportunity to begin to make sense of the spoken language surrounding them. It isn't something that happens overnight. It takes time.
*pounds head against computer*
FYI, there was a REASON why HOH and EVEN DEAF kids were dx "late" as toddlers. Kids can compensate very well! ....Here's my thinking.....Yes, kids may benifit from exposure to sound and speech, BUT by being anal (gotta wear it every single waking hour) about having your kid wear a HA/CI you're implying that they're not smart enough to expolarate quality exposure to speech/language to the big picture. I'm not talking about NOT wearng the HA/CI. I'm saying that a kid can benifit just as much from wearing a HA for 4 hours as they can from "gotta wear it every single waking hour"....HOH kids already have quite a bit of exposure to speech, since a lot of them can hear somewhat WITHOUT their aids.
FYI, your assumptions and assertions are incorrect and faulty.
CSign, the research has been done on DEAF kids. NOT HOH. There's been very little research on HOH kids.
But in this case when the kid doesn't have the aids on for a bit, or even a few hours, its not going to automaticly inhibit aquastion of speech or learning how to hear. It's the QUALITY, not the quanity.
CSign, the research has been done on DEAF kids. NOT HOH. There's been very little research on HOH kids.
But in this case when the kid doesn't have the aids on for a bit, or even a few hours, its not going to automaticly inhibit aquastion of speech or learning how to hear. It's the QUALITY, not the quanity.