$100,000 to Spend On a Car - What Do You get?

wouldn't spend that 100k on cars...I'll use that to pay for all of my tuition cost...geesh, colleges are too expensive those days.
 
The Highlander said:
In your dream.

I was talking about MPRS price. :slap:

Again, No, it is not under $100k, you forget about after tax, fee, etc.
Click to expand...

gesh, stop bing an ultra realist kill joy, this is a wish list thread not a price checker...there was a 95,000 audi R8 in the same website with higher milage who cares, i like the dark grey one better (was it gunmetal grey?)
groan even with my wish for the three of the 80's supercars it probably wont fit in a 100k budget but fuck it would be nice if it did! that would be my boyhood auto-wet dream come true!!
 
sequoias said:
Seen it before. In the US market, we call it Datsun 510. My friend used to have a 1970 Datsun 510 with 4 doors with a 1600cc 4 cylinder.
Click to expand...

My dad used to have datsun 510s.. I need to get pictures of me fixing them up. :D

My first stick shift car I drove was a 2200 cylinder turbo 510. FAST as all hell. I was 11 years old.
 
FINE...

im gonna get Land Rover Range Rover (it is UNDER 100k)

img_047.jpg
 
For $100,000? I would get a car that doesn't exist.
 
deafsmogtech said:
I love a Jeep CG SRT-8......Hemi motor. One thing is AWD, dang... maybe I can disconnect
Driveshaft in the front to disable AWD. Good launch, smell burnt rubber.
Click to expand...

Once you disable AWD then 0-60mph a sec will slow down due tires spin too much.
 
The Highlander said:
Once you disable AWD then 0-60mph a sec will slow down due tires spin too much.
Click to expand...

No sweat. Close to same time in 0-60mph. AWD demands lot of torque to launch as the engine work hard and pick up speed slow. RWD can pick up speed at the middle of the 0-60 mph range. AWD is not my DNA. Sorry
 
deafsmogtech said:
No sweat. Close to same time in 0-60mph. AWD demands lot of torque to launch as the engine work hard and pick up speed slow. RWD can pick up speed at the middle of the 0-60 mph range. AWD is not my DNA. Sorry
Click to expand...

I hate to tell you but I am disagreed with you. Nowhere close to same time.

Few of my friends drove my old Subaru and they like whoa! and one of them admitted that my Subaru AWD is very quick than his chevy camaro 91 V8 even his engine is high HP than mine at old time.

2010 Chevy Camaro SS with 422-hp 6.2-liter LS3 V8 six-speed manual
0-60mph in 4.9 second


2010 Subaru Sti with 305hp 2.5-liter with turbocharger EJ25 H4 six-speed manual
0-60 in in 4.4 second.


Explain to me why RWD with 422HP can't quick than AWD with 305HP for 0-60mph in sec?


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGUvdHZIP-U[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxvKzRblyOI[/ame]
:eek3:

Trust me, I drove Corvette, GTO, Camaro,Mustang, BMW M3, etc, They are manual transmission and they are not really quick enough to me than Wrx, Sti, and Eclipse GSX AWD.

I don't really care about MAX SPEED since there is speed limited 55-70 almost anywhere in USA but I can do 0-60 at 55mph speed limited for fun and perfect for drag racing.
 
Ken Block own Ford Fiesta with 650HP 660 LB-FT torque at the wheels AWD 0-60 in 1.9 SECONDS.

Yes, I said 1.9 seconds.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TshFWSsrn8[/ame]

Yes, you can smoke your tires with AWD.
 
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g72wjymhT3g[/ame]


Guess what? Richard Petty said not bad at AWD car. :)
 
thats one of the most shocking car testing video i have ever seen, its incredible, no, wait fucking fantastic!! *opens my pursue, how much is it?*
 
and I must say, the fiesta handling is very good, espeically in the wet.
 
Honda Accord iLX 1987 with remodel, paint and replace new engine as if it's new. :D

I guess that probably cost me much as $30-40k
 
Back
Top