- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 143
You can know from the forensics of the shooting.
like I said - legal complication. a legal headache.
You can know from the forensics of the shooting.
yes. like I said - it would be icky situation for you regardless of who called first.... as well as if he called cop on you.
You can know from the forensics of the shooting.
If it's already an icky situation and someone is going to call anyway then you should certainly be first.
September 2012
"Ayoob: I’d call 9-1-1 immediately. We’ve seen case after case where the bad guy didn’t go with the armed citizen’s fantasy script to run off wetting his pants. Instead, he left the scene, called in, made up a story where you were the one that attacked him, and HE got to be the complainant. The criminal justice system is geared on the assumption that whoever made the original complaint is the victim and whomever they are complaining about is the suspect, the person of interest, and the perpetrator."
like I said - legal complication. a legal headache.
In that scenario, if he wasn't shot, why would the guy with the crowbar even call the police?for example - road rage (let's assume there is no witness around). an angry guy angrily approached you with a crowbar/bat and you took your gun out but you didn't shoot. he wentand ran away. so it doesn't matter if you or he called a cop first. it's just very icky because he can claim that you took your gun out in anger and he was scared shitless.
you never know. it would be a legal nightmare for you. would be a great idea to install a dashcam.
In that scenario, if he wasn't shot, why would the guy with the crowbar even call the police?
In that scenario, if he wasn't shot, why would the guy with the crowbar even call the police?
Well leaving a scene is "legal complication. a legal headache"
There have been a few cases where they do call the police. Probably because they are so pissed. They call up and of coarse their story is "I was just minding my own business whey this crazy guy with a gun tried to kill me!"
If it's already an icky situation and someone is going to call anyway then you should certainly be first.
September 2012
"Ayoob: I’d call 9-1-1 immediately. We’ve seen case after case where the bad guy didn’t go with the armed citizen’s fantasy script to run off wetting his pants. Instead, he left the scene, called in, made up a story where you were the one that attacked him, and HE got to be the complainant. The criminal justice system is geared on the assumption that whoever made the original complaint is the victim and whomever they are complaining about is the suspect, the person of interest, and the perpetrator."
of course he had to leave the scene cuz you were the one with a gun. he fled and called 911 on you.
of course he had to leave the scene cuz you were the one with a gun. he fled and called 911 on you.
it's very easy to assert "Road Rage"
when there is a gun involved in a case of road rage.... major legal headache. you'll have to remain silence and retain a lawyer (strongly advisable).
I'm talking about you leaving the scene. The only reason I can see that you wouldn't want to call the police is if you where just going to leave. That is generally viewed as an admitting guilt. So when the police track you down later it's going to get really complicated.
Got it.That only helps if you actually had to fire though.
yes.
and even if you call 911 on him first... it's still a legal complication for you. that's why I have a top gun lawyer handy on my speed dial.
Yes, the driver had gun that lead me to flee away from scene and dialed 911.
I went to police station to file the report.