Im not entirely sure either. It just sort of popped into my head at the time.Not sure why you narrowed it down to those two options, I would think one would be indecisive to choose either. I have broken off engagements involving both though.
Aw, that is so true. Its so weird that we always seem to forget there are all different kinds of love. And all of them can be fulfilling in their own way. Id much rather have option one, too. I may not be exactly as happy as i always hoped, but at least i could be content that im free and not abused.Well if I had ONLY those choices.. then I'd go with choice A. Not be in love with the person but treated well. Sometimes being treated well is a form of love- and I'd be doing the same for the other...
What if you didnt realize right away that you were being treated badly? Like you were together ten years before it started to dawn on you that somethings not right?I couldn't be in love with someone that treated me badly. Infatuated? Perhaps. In love for life? No way.
...For there to even be a relationship in the first place you have to feel something akin to love and care for the person.
Omg! I would LOVE one of those! Lucky girl!My ex is the first one. I didn't love him, not that way, but more as friends. But he treats me like a princess. Even today he does. He bought me a good coated blue rose. It's worth $500!!!!
I completely agree with you. What makes one person happy wont be the same as the next.Right? You definitely have the idea that concerns me, but doesn’t apply to everyone (If I chose either of the above choices, god forbid... ) But I have to feel something with that person, that’s how I know. Then others can do fine in a less fulfilling manner. No one relationship is better over another as long as it makes them happy, be it liberal or traditional.
The thing is, I was the aggressor during the second choice, it’s not always on a man. But I see your point to bring to light the above two choices.
But did you give him something in return? It's nice to see him treating you like a princess. For me I would do the same thing but not like I keep on giving her expensive stuff and get nothing in return.... this would be unbalance relationship... you know?My ex is the first one. I didn't love him, not that way, but more as friends. But he treats me like a princess. Even today he does. He bought me a good coated blue rose. It's worth $500!!!!
He may have given her a really nice rose, but not everything is monetary. If there's mutual respect and understanding (and even gifts from the heart) that CAN be enough. Giving expensive stuff should be from what you desire to do, and NOT expecting your partner to do in return.But did you give him something in return? It's nice to see him treating you like a princess. For me I would do the same thing but not like I keep on giving her expensive stuff and get nothing in return.... this would be unbalance relationship... you know?
No I didn't get him a gift back. He asked me not to. I am his only friend and he gets happy knowing I am happy.But did you give him something in return? It's nice to see him treating you like a princess. For me I would do the same thing but not like I keep on giving her expensive stuff and get nothing in return.... this would be unbalance relationship... you know?
Don’t know how you could begin to love if your not treated well? Sound like attraction instead of love had an aunt who married guy loved her but her response was she loved him but was not in love with him??? Took me years figuring that outJust a thought that popped into my head. i may even delete it later.