I was trying to say some of the d/Deaf working in there are only hand picked because they will do what they're told and that is not making it any easier for d/Deaf, except modes of communications and probably easier for the hearing.
However, nothing else really emphasise on improving deaf peoples lives, its more about assisting hearing institutions telling us what to do, and what we cant do. By this, it is the way how these hand-picked d/Deaf staffs elicted a certain favourable conformity behaviours both in the style of duties to be directed and in the ideological mindsets, regarding the attitudes toward work and politics placed on higher priority over (deaf)rights. But indeed linguistic issues are political matters but as far as implementation of structural configuration of the wider society are left unquestioned, educators (those on the board, and administration level) understood the use of appropriate language
working well for deaf students not only provide good educational results but also economic sense in terms of time and effort to teach deaf students are seen as efficient. Everything else is not considered into the picture and neither the consequences have on d/Deaf people exposure to the real world after (and outside) the schooling years.
