you can't be both left and right, they can not be compatiable. Economic systems are dependent on social attitudes of people towards how money matters.
Of course, you ee hardly any d/Deaf people attending those, its because they are indoctrinated to think Deaf culture matters more than how disability policies affects them - Deaf people follows a Cultural model over the Social model. To make matter worse, Deaf people want segration and disabled do not.
This is coming from an awareness of Disability rights, and this certain perspective draws in a wider aspects of social activity
I know exactly what you are saying, but semiotics stemming from the trickle down effect of right-wing social policies have also done a terrific (sarcastic -but not to you) to change the way we use language and in so doing, we also unwittingly absorb this ideation of what is privilieged and not. It is not privilieging about having aids given to us, or bigger hand-outs when you consider the harsher economic climate and increasing expenses of equipments which meant to ameliorate our lives. I can't see how this should be equated as 'privilege'.
Again, this is language being in dynamic than as a static means of communication, but that I mean, not just the introducing new words, but also new attachment to ideology, that is ideology of the right wing.
Language is NEVER neutral, never has been.
