A contiunation of the Parants and CI thread.
No, I'm not judging you at all. I don't know where you got that. Very puzzled. I'm just saying that while you were raised without Sign, you a) only had mild loss from birth (right?) and b) you're also pretty much postlingally deaf. What I was trying to say is that posties/ perilingal (those who lost their hearing on the cusp of aquirring language tend to have a different experiance from dhh kids who have always been dhh or lost their hearing early on. I wasn't being deafer then thou.
Speech therapy can mean a whole lot of things from remediation of a lisp to teaching a kid how to swallow. Did you have language therapy that was designed for dhh kids? Again.....I'm not saying that you're not "really deaf".....I think that's how you're interpreting what I'm saying.
I'm simply saying that your experiance as a pretty much postlingal dhh kid was different then growing up dhh orally with a prelingal very significent loss. ( eg. a loss that significently affects spoken language aquastion)
Although I am only hoh, I did have very intense spoken language intervention in preschool and kindergarten as well as dhh "speech" (modulation, tone, volumne etc) up til I graduated high school.
Other dhh kids may have attended an oral program/ gone to AVT/ been enrolled in things like the John Tracy program etc.
You did grow up without sign language.....but that would have been more " oral as default." as opposed to
I wouldn't call you traditionally oral (meaning had to have intense spoken language thearapy) but you did grow up without sign...... Hmmmm.......tough debate you know? Can a postie or kid with mild loss be automaticly oral, even thou they may not have had intense speech therapy or oral schooling ? Interesting debate...........
Huh??DD,
I'm not going to compare myself to others here on AD. You need to remember that I'm also totally blind, so I did not have the advantage of lipreading which you are so fond of encouraging when it comes to having a full "communication toolbox." I would appreciate it if you would not judge me. I haven't done that to anyone here, so I would appreciate the same courtesy in return.
No, I'm not judging you at all. I don't know where you got that. Very puzzled. I'm just saying that while you were raised without Sign, you a) only had mild loss from birth (right?) and b) you're also pretty much postlingally deaf. What I was trying to say is that posties/ perilingal (those who lost their hearing on the cusp of aquirring language tend to have a different experiance from dhh kids who have always been dhh or lost their hearing early on. I wasn't being deafer then thou.
No. no, not at all....... See above. I actually have a moderately severe loss, that is genetic and congential in nature....this isn't a audiogram contest or something. It's not It's simply the difference between the postie/peri vs. prelingally/ congentially deaf experiance, that's all.DD,
If we're going to compare people with hearing loss, what about you? You have a moderate hearing loss and can still hear quite well. Does that mean it's fair for me to say you don't have the same challenges as I did when I had severe-profound hearing loss? Until you've walked a mile in another person's shoes, you have no idea what they experience.
On the other hand, was it for articualtion issues (very common overall in the hearing population) or language therapy specificly for blind children?FYI, I did have speech therapy in elementary school. The only reason I've never mentioned it here is because I only had speech therapy for a very short period of time.
Speech therapy can mean a whole lot of things from remediation of a lisp to teaching a kid how to swallow. Did you have language therapy that was designed for dhh kids? Again.....I'm not saying that you're not "really deaf".....I think that's how you're interpreting what I'm saying.
I'm simply saying that your experiance as a pretty much postlingal dhh kid was different then growing up dhh orally with a prelingal very significent loss. ( eg. a loss that significently affects spoken language aquastion)
Although I am only hoh, I did have very intense spoken language intervention in preschool and kindergarten as well as dhh "speech" (modulation, tone, volumne etc) up til I graduated high school.
Other dhh kids may have attended an oral program/ gone to AVT/ been enrolled in things like the John Tracy program etc.
You did grow up without sign language.....but that would have been more " oral as default." as opposed to
Well the thing is..... Hear Again, wasn't forbidden to use ASL or other methods. It was more like oral as default...... Make sense? You DID however have the experiance of discovering ASL as a really useful tool and wishing you had it earlier right?I thought any HOH or deaf person who was forbidden the exposure of ASL was considered as oral-only?
I wouldn't call you traditionally oral (meaning had to have intense spoken language thearapy) but you did grow up without sign...... Hmmmm.......tough debate you know? Can a postie or kid with mild loss be automaticly oral, even thou they may not have had intense speech therapy or oral schooling ? Interesting debate...........