Not only that, but this is subject to interpretation and competing agendas. I can see that SOME audiologists might push CIs for somebody, but not all audis do that. Making blanket statements is not only unfair, but its also wrong. A CI is NOT appropriate for someone who isn't bilaterally profoundly deaf. It's really that simple and any audi should know that. I know the FDA has relaxed the criterior for children, but even then, no surgeon will implant someone who isn't profoundly deaf.
I really, really wish people on both sides of the issue would stop pushing agendas as it serves no purpose. Each person has the right to make up his or her mind about the CI. Vampy had an experience and made his decision accordingly. He appears happy with his HAs and that's great! So, what's the problem????? I don't see one here other than someone making a mountain out of a molehill. 
