Alright, alright, just chill. June 24th is when we will know the judge's decision. I have no problem with that.
I have to repeat my question. Does the guilty one deserve a death penalty? If not, why not? He's not innocent that everyone including you know, get what I say? You oppose death penalties because there are flaws in the justice system, I understand that but in the Boston bomber's case, why do you think he should not be punished by death while you know that he's not innocent and he's a terrorist?
