No, of course not?
Right, he did not refuse to use his CI. Social issues, yes.
Yes, so what... I am not sure what your point is. This child wanted to rely on the CI alone, refusing to use sign language. Later it turned out this did not work very well, and the child realized she belonged a place she rejected earlier. If this child was not provided with a CI, the social issues could perhaps been avoided. My point is that if one claim that CI allways is a good thing, some perspectives and examples are missing.
If they didn't got CI, they would never be able to listen and speak? I think we are exaggerating a bit now...
