Reply to thread

Some people here continue to assert that Sorenson's point of view is correct and appropriate, even in light of arguments against:


1) Interoperability:  What's Sorenson's justification to prevent their users from contacting other VRS device users by telephone number, when it was possible before?


2) VRS interoperability:  What's Sorenson's justification to prevent their users from contacting other VRS services in any way possible?


3) D-Link features:  What's Sorenson's justification for using their agreement with D-Link to prevent all other VRS providers from implementing features and enhancments on their own videophones?


4) Privacy: What's Sorenson's justification for having the right to watch you and record everything you do with your VP-100 and decide what is acceptable for you to do with a VP-100?


Back
Top