Sham cancer charities face federal charges of stealing $187M

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
Charities that claimed their funds were helping patients fighting cancer but were actually spending the bulk of donations on vacations, concerts and other luxurious perks are facing federal charges that they stole more than $187 million from consumers in one of the biggest charity fraud cases ever filed.

The Federal Trade Commission, along with law enforcement officials throughout the U.S., filed the complaint against the Cancer Fund of America, Children's Cancer Fund of America, The Breast Cancer Society and Cancer Support Services, along with several of those organizations' executives.

"The defendants' egregious scheme effectively deprived legitimate cancer charities and cancer patients of much-needed funds and support," Jessica Rich, director of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. "The defendants took in millions of dollars in donations meant to help cancer patients, but spent it on themselves and their fundraisers. I'm pleased that the FTC and our state partners are acting to end this appalling scheme."

The complaint charges that the charities were shams, calling, mailing and passing out materials through the Combined Federal Campaign, which collects donations from federal workers for non-profit groups, based on the premise that they helped cancer patients in a variety of ways, including getting them to chemotherapy treatments and providing them with pain medication and hospice care.

In reality, the organizations were used to provide cushy gigs for family members and friends, while donations went toward plush trips, Jet Ski outings and college fees. Professional fundraisers who were brought on board often got 85% or more of each contribution.

The Children's Cancer Fund of America and its president and executive director, Rose Perkins, along with The Breast Cancer Society and its executive director, James Reynolds II, and Cancer Support Services' chief financial officer, Kyle Effler, have agreed to settle the charges that they are facing.

The three executives will be barred from managing charities, fundraising and overseeing charity assets. The Children's Cancer Fund of America and The Breast Cancer Society will also go out of business. The other parties in the complaint will continue to face legal action.

Daniel Borochoff of the group CharityWatch said in an email that he was "grateful that our government regulators are working to put a stop to these four outfits that have been misleading the public and wasting America's precious charitable dollars for far too long. ... This claim illustrates why we need better charity accountability and more regulatory enforcement.''

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story...ncer-charities-face-federal-charges/27586821/
 
What are the exact charges?
How does one settle the charges?
Plea?
Where there even criminal charges laid?
All i see is them being banned from running a charity?
Let me get this straight?
These people stole 187 million and all that they got was a bann on working in charities? No time. Nothing..
Damn.
I was doing it wrong....even in my darkest times i had a heart and robbin sick kids was beneath me.....
this guys got away with it....
(Shakes head)
 
They need to be tarred & feathered (naked) and thrown out on skid row....that's why I'm very reluctant to give to charities....even the Bell Ringer for the Salvation Army at Xmas....Even 1 mother was spending the $$ from the Girl Scouts Cookie Drive...
 
Girl Scouts cookies cost too much money , I had not brought any in years and I never give to cancer charities b/c I don't like having animals tested on. Beagles are used a lot b/c they're very trustful and loyal to people and I will have no part of harming these sweet dogs. :(
 
Charity should give away 90% and 10% for themselves. Should make random selection low-income who have cancer to help out as anonymous. That's how the job it should be done...
 
Back
Top