Sexual Harassment Claims Growing by Men

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
546
Critics Say Sexual Harassment Claims by Men Still Harder to Pursue

After Jed Lorenzen won his sexual harassment lawsuit, he bought himself a new suit.

"It's my power suit to remind me that's what you get when you stand up for yourself," the 33-year-old Los Angeles, Calif. man said.

When it comes to alleged sexual harassment, more men are standing up for themselves these days. Of the nearly 12,700 sexual harassment complaints filed with the U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission in the 2009 fiscal year, 16 percent -- some 2,030 -- came from men. That's up from 9.9 percent, or roughly 1,430, a decade-and-half earlier. The number of complaints from men increased even as the number of overall cases have declined.

"It's not really clear whether more men are being subjected to harassment or more men are willing to come forward," said Ernest Haffner, a senior attorney adviser at the EEOC. "There are more decisions in the courts dealing with sexual harassment by men -- it could be that just more men are aware of their rights as they speak to attorneys."

But just because more men are filing claims, it doesn't mean male victims have achieved parity with their female counterparts -- at least not in the public eye, some experts say.

Attorney Keith Fink, who represented Lorenzen and his twin brother Wyatt in a complaint the two filed against a restaurant, says men still face a stigma in speaking out about sexual harassment. That's true for both male and female-instigated harassment, he said.

"People either are homophobic or they think men can weather the storm of verbal barrage better than a female, or they're just not as empathetic as a female (victim)," he said.

In the Lorenzens' case, a jury awarded the brothers $1,000 each in damages, a figure Fink suspects would have been much higher had his clients been women.

Jed Lorenzen agrees.

"I thought the monetary amount was quite ridiculous, but I think it was because we weren't women up there on the stand, breaking down and crying and looking, I guess, 'more weak.'"

"I don' t consider women weak," he added, "(but) I think because we are men, our case wasn't taken as seriously."

Fink said that the potential for lower awards -- and hence, lower attorney's fees -- is one reason why some attorneys may decline to pursue sexual harassment complaints.

Not all claims are resolved with small awards, however. Some male sexual harassment cases have resulted in payments of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, including a lawsuit filed by the EEOC against the restaurant chain, The Cheesecake Factory. A settlement reached between the EEOC and the chain last November stipulated that The Cheesecake Factory pay $345,000 to six male employees who claimed they had been subject to "sexually abusive behavior" such as "simulated rape" at a Cheesecake Factory restaurant in Chandler, Ariz., according to an EEOC statement and court documents.

In court documents filed in response to the lawsuit, The Cheesecake Factory argued that the employees had not been "subjected to unlawful sexual harassment." After the settlement was announced, the chain released a statement to the press saying that it had agreed to the settlement to prevent continued litigation and continued to deny wrongdoing.

(More to this story)....
Sexual Harassment Claims by Men Growing but Not Equal - ABC News
 
that is wild. I would have thought that most men wanted to be sexually harassed. :rofl2:
 
In the few weeks ago, In the office, I was stunned to hear that a guy in late 20's reported to the mangagement that he filed it allegedly harrassment against the late 50's lady who pushed her hand placing on his shoulder and teasingly saying, "what a mess what you have on your desk". :shock:
 
I wouldn't be surprised to find Jiro in here after I'm through with him! :giggle:
 
Sexual harassment is about power not sex. As women gain more positions of power over men, sexual harassment claims by men will continue to grow. No matter which gender the perpetrator is, it's wrong and illegal.
 
In the few weeks ago, In the office, I was stunned to hear that a guy in late 20's reported to the mangagement that he filed it allegedly harrassment against the late 50's lady who pushed her hand placing on his shoulder and teasingly saying, "what a mess what you have on your desk". :shock:
To me, that is not sexual harrasment.
 
Sexual harassment is about power not sex. As women gain more positions of power over men, sexual harassment claims by men will continue to grow. No matter which gender the perpetrator is, it's wrong and illegal.
Not exactly. Sexual harrasment is;

unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when:

- submission to the conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual’s employment, or
- submission to or rejection of the conduct by an individual is used as a ,basis for employment decisions affecting such individual, or
- the conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.

Source: Sexual Harassment Fact Sheet
 
LOL at souggy.

RD, i do not know what kind of harrasment did he report to, sexual or just plain harrasment. I am just shocked because i know them personally. It must be a conflict of interest between them.
 
That's what I said. The instigator is in a position of power; in this case, the power to alter or terminate employment. The person may be an officer in the military. What makes it sexual harassment is that the victim is under the authority of the person making the sexual request. If a coworker who is not your supervisor makes a proposition, that's an entirely different situation.
 
That's what I said. The instigator is in a position of power; in this case, the power to alter or terminate employment. The person may be an officer in the military. What makes it sexual harassment is that the victim is under the authority of the person making the sexual request. If a coworker who is not your supervisor makes a proposition, that's an entirely different situation.

Sexual harassment is about power not sex................

So you see it is about sex. Technically it is about sex first then using your power to try to enforce the request. So you can't really say it's not about sex. It is about sex and in fact that is how it usually starts.
 
Sex is between too freely consenting adults. If there is an element of coercion, it's not just sex. I think that you are saying that the person asked nicely then decided to use coercion. It doesn't matter if the person asked nicely first. Consenting sex and sex under coercion are mutually exclusive ideas, though. Either a person consents or they don't. Coercion negates consent. In the case of a minor or incapacitated adult, that person cannot consent. It's very logical.
 
Last edited:
Wirelessly posted

Let me get this straight... to overpower someone, you use sexually subversive statements? Sounds misleading, I think most would take advantage of one's shortcomings to overpower someone.
 
There are many women bosses who have the "power" over male employees....And women will use this "power" over a man if she wants sex from him.....or be fired! or demoted....or harrassed until he quits....it's happened many, many times.

It's not unusual!....Sexual harrassment works both ways for men and women.....Suppose you are a male, happily married or have a g/f, and are loyal to her....but your woman boss is making advances towards you?...If you say No...she is in a position to find a way to fire you....

Men are somewhat "embarrassed" to talk about it. If your woman boss was in her 50's and you were a "young" guy, would you want to have sex with her? Probably not!...Almost like having sex with your mother....BUT, some women bosses will not take "NO" for an answer, and they will keep pushing it until you relent, or they fire you.
 
Sex is between too freely consenting adults. If there is an element of coercion, it's not just sex. I think that you are saying that the person asked nicely then decided to use coercion. It doesn't matter if the person asked nicely first. Consenting sex and sex under coercion are mutually exclusive ideas, though. Either a person consents or they don't. Coercion negates consent. In the case of a minor or incapacitated adult, that person cannot consent. It's very logical.
The link I provided you is how sexual harassment is defined by law.
 
I am glad to see more men coming forward with the cases of sexual harassment out in the public.

We need to show that sexual harassment shows no preference towards gender, orientation and/or affiliation.

It is just too bad that boys/men have to go through the stigma of reporting sexual harassment from their peers and/or girls/women.

Some men would say "I'd give anything to be sexually harassed by her!" or "I'd hit that!", not realising they are compounding the problem at hand.
 
Back
Top