VamPyroX
bloody phreak from hell
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2003
- Messages
- 34,374
- Reaction score
- 21
Jeez... now they're here! :fu2:
Record labels subpoena RIT
Unidentified student accused of illegally sharing music online
By Gary Craig
Staff writer
(October 8, 2003) — A Rochester Institute of Technology student, accused of illegally sharing music over the Internet, is now in the cross hairs of the recording industry.
Federal court records show that the university was subpoenaed last week for information about a student who had provided music for uploading over RIT’s Internet service. The music ranged from pop artist Michael Jackson to hip-hop duo OutKast, according to the court records.
The university has identified the student and provided her with the subpoena, RIT’s Chief Information Officer Diane Barbour said Monday. The university will also give the student’s name to lawyers for the Recording Industry Association of America, or RIAA, Barbour said.
Because of “the fact that we were served the subpoena, we have no choice but to provide them with the (student’s) name, address and telephone number,’’ Barbour said. She declined to publicly identify the student, except to say she is female.
In the past month, lawyers for the RIAA have swept the country with subpoenas in a bid to stymie the Internet sharing of copyright music. The recording industry has blamed the continuing downward spiral of music sales on the growth of Internet sharing, while critics say the industry has made compact discs too costly for many consumers to buy.
U.S. copyright laws allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each individual copyright song illegally offered by an Internet user. The RIAA has filed 261 lawsuits and has settled with 64 people accused of illegal file-sharing.
The RIT subpoena appears to be the first served on an area college or university.
The court records don’t allege how much copyright music the student shared, but an RIAA representative said the industry has been targeting the most “egregious’’ offenders.
With its initial wave of attacks against music downloaders, the industry has largely focused on individuals who have made available 1,000 or more songs for sharing. But others who don’t download music as frequently shouldn’t feel immune, industry representatives say.
RIAA officials say they want to steer music lovers to legal Internet options, where music can be downloaded for a fee.
“Our enforcement efforts are all about increasing the awareness that there are legal ways to get music online,’’ said RIAA spokeswoman Amanda Collins. “There’s no need to steal it.’’
Tim Lund, an RIT student and president of the campus Society of Software Engineers, said the recording industry is being a bully with its legal tactics.
“What the RIAA is attempting to do is make examples out of people for file sharing,’’ Lund said in an e-mail. “Their idea is to find people who file share a lot and effectively sue them into oblivion.’’ He said the RIAA could have tried a different approach with the RIT student, such as asking RIT to ban her Internet use.
RIT has warned students about the possible legal ramifications of file-sharing, Barbour said. RIT even sent a letter to parents, encouraging them to dissuade students from sharing.
Barbour said she hopes the students get the word that the RIAA is serious about legal actions against music downloaders. Until last week, she said, RIT hadn’t seen any subpoenas related to illegal music-sharing.
“This is the first one that we’ve received,’’ she said. “It’s hopefully the last, but we can’t be sure of that.’’
Jeez... now, they're going too far! :fu2:The hit list
Court papers show that the songs made available by an RIT student for file-sharing included: {ldquo}Aquemini,{rdquo} OutKast {ldquo}Someone to Love You,{rdquo} Ruff Endz {ldquo}Shoot the Moon,{rdquo} Norah Jones {ldquo}Rule,{rdquo} Nas {ldquo}Smooth Criminal,{rdquo} Michael Jackson {ldquo}Just a Friend,{rdquo} Mario {ldquo}Fantasy,{rdquo} Mariah Carey {ldquo}Like a Prayer,{rdquo} Madonna