No, no I didn't. I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand and what you interpret. I said meat has the bad fat, not that meat is bad.
This is the problem you are having with the article you posted. It does not say that the fat in bacon is good, it says it has less total fat than "many popular" cuts of beef and chicken. Which is dubious to say the least, there are many lean cuts of beef that would have less fat than bacon and ANY cut of chicken with the skin removed would have less fat than bacon. BUT saying that it has less fat, we're talking about the same kind of fat here btw, saturated, is not the same as saying that is good fat. You have your own skewed interpretation going on that the article does not support.
OOh, and the article doesn't have to say which kind of meat, they mean meat, ALL meat. The fat in meat, all meat, is saturated. This is not something you need to eat, you will not find it on the lists of dily nutritional requirements because you are an animal, you are meat, you can and do make your own saturated fat.
If you look at body builders diets, you are NOT gong to find bacon on there. You'll find stuff like bison, lean proteins low in fat, and when they say fat, they mean saturated, I say this again, because you seem to have a hard time understanding it, the fat in meat, all meat is saturated fat.
I thought of something that might help you understand. When I'm talking about fat and meat, I'm talking about 2 different things. The meat is not the fat and the fat is not the meat. The fat can be removed from the meat, chicken, take the skin off, beef trim the fat off the sides. t's when the fat is all marbled through the meat, like in bacon, that you can't get it out and it's fatty.