Steel X
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2003
- Messages
- 13,829
- Reaction score
- 55
So, in another line of work by acclaimed director, Peter Jackson, who has directed the LoTR triogoy, has come up with another production, the King Kong re-make.
The big question is...WHY???
while, of course, most movie re-makes usually suck, but maybe with his intellence of work and adding in more stunts, thrills, and adventurous scenes in the King Kong re-make...
but, as I said, movie re-makes are horrible and that I say let the orginal be left alone, no matter how bad the orginal was, the re-make would be just HORRIBLE.
For example, "Godzilla" and "The Haunting" were just HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE ass-sucking filthy, worthless flicks ever!
then again, who knows? sometimes re-makes aren't so bad...
for example, "Ocean's 11" and "The italian job" were as impressive as the orginals were.
But, sure, I have seen the orginal movie of King Kong, which was proably made in the 1930s or 1940s...I'm not really sure but it wasn't too good though. So maybe Peter Jackson can improve that.
I have thought that Peter Jackson would direct "the hobbit" which takes place before the LoTR triogoly....oh well. Maybe he'll do it in afew years or so...beats me. perhas another director would do that. again, beats me.
so who's going bananas to see "King Kong"?
The big question is...WHY???
while, of course, most movie re-makes usually suck, but maybe with his intellence of work and adding in more stunts, thrills, and adventurous scenes in the King Kong re-make...
but, as I said, movie re-makes are horrible and that I say let the orginal be left alone, no matter how bad the orginal was, the re-make would be just HORRIBLE.
For example, "Godzilla" and "The Haunting" were just HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE ass-sucking filthy, worthless flicks ever!
then again, who knows? sometimes re-makes aren't so bad...
for example, "Ocean's 11" and "The italian job" were as impressive as the orginals were.
But, sure, I have seen the orginal movie of King Kong, which was proably made in the 1930s or 1940s...I'm not really sure but it wasn't too good though. So maybe Peter Jackson can improve that.
I have thought that Peter Jackson would direct "the hobbit" which takes place before the LoTR triogoly....oh well. Maybe he'll do it in afew years or so...beats me. perhas another director would do that. again, beats me.
so who's going bananas to see "King Kong"?