Reply to thread

Yes but not by the deaf consumer.  The attorney and/or the court (depending on the situation) pays the interpreter.


I had a real estate attorney try to charge the deaf client for my services by tacking on the interpreting fee to the closing costs.  I explained to the attorney that he wasn't allowed to do that.  He had to go back and write a check to reimburse the deaf client.  I didn't leave until I knew everything was straightened out.


No one cheats on my watch.  :mad:


Back
Top